Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29624636›Full record

ArticleCancer2018

Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis.

Matthew R Danzig, Katherine Mallin, James M McKiernan, Walter M Stadler, Srikala S Sridhar, Todd M Morgan, Bernard H Bochner, Cheryl T Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew R DanzigDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-0016
Katherine MallinAmerican College of Surgeons, Commission on Cancer, Chicago, Illinois.
James M McKiernanDepartment of Urology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Walter M StadlerSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-2527
Srikala S SridharDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Todd M MorganDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bernard H BochnerDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Cheryl T LeeDepartment of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current study was conducted to assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis.

methodsPatients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis who underwent radical nephroureterectomy from 2010 through 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were characterized according to demographic and clinical factors, including pathologic tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion. Associations with overall survival were assessed through proportional hazards regression analysis.

resultsA total of 4177 patients were identified; 1576 had lymphovascular invasion. Patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion had 5-year survival that was significantly worse than that of patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 52.6; P < .001 by the log-rank test), and approached that of patients with T4 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 26.5%; P = .002). On multivariate analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, grade, lymph node status, surgical margin status, race, sex, and chemotherapy administration, patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion also were found to have significantly worse survival compared with patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.91).

conclusionsLymphovascular invasion status is a key prognostic marker that can stratify the risk of patients with pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma further. Patients with this pathologic feature should be carefully considered for clinical trials exploring existing and novel therapies. Cancer 2018;124:2507-14. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney NeoplasmsKidney PelvisLymphatic MetastasisLymphatic VesselsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNephroureterectomycancer staginglymphovascular invasionprognosissurvivalupper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29624636
PMCPMC8248269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.