Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29624591›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Optimal cut-off for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: Fact or Fantasy? A prospective cohort study in metastatic cancer patients.

Yann-Alexandre Vano, Stéphane Oudard, Marie-Agnès By, Pauline Têtu, Constance Thibault, Hail Aboudagga, Florian Scotté, Reza Elaidi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05301985 (Effects of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate Loading on Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio and Postoperative Complications Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05301985 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate Loading on Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio and Postoperative Complications Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNermina RizvanovićRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsNeutrophil, Lymphocyte, Postoperative ComplicationsArmspreoperative nutrition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yann-Alexandre VanoDepartment of Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9410-1368
Stéphane OudardDepartment of Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Marie-Agnès ByDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Pauline TêtuDepartment of Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Constance ThibaultDepartment of Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Hail AboudaggaUniversity of Paris 5 Descartes, Paris, France.
Florian ScottéDepartment of Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Reza ElaidiAssociation pour la Recherche de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie, Department of Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the prognostic value of pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Clinical and biological data for patients with metastatic solid tumors treated in an oncology outpatient department and prospectively followed by a call center (PROCHE program) between January 2008 and December 2011 were analyzed. All patients with an NLR value within 28 days before the first cycle of first-line of chemotherapy were included (cohort 1). To assess influence of chemotherapy line on NLR prognostic value, data from patients treated with later chemotherapy lines were also analyzed (cohort 2). Adjusted multivariate Cox regressions with or without non-linear and time-dependent effects were performed. Optimal NLR cut-off was investigated by time-dependent sensitivity analysis using several indices. There were 317 and 134 patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Elevated NLR was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 1.35 [95% confidence interval 1.19-1.54]; p<0.0001). The optimal NLR cut-off in cohort 1 was dependent on index used and time of assessment: HR values were non-significant at a cut-off of 3.0 (1.34 [0.99-1.32], but significant when the cut-off was 4.0 (1.53 [1.11-2.10]). NLR was linearly related to mortality risk; in subgroup analysis, no significant interaction was found with co-variables or tumor localization overall (cohorts 1+2). Pre-treatment NLR is a useful prognostic tool in patients with metastatic solid tumors, irrespective of primary tumor site, chemotherapy line, age, gender and performance status. However, using an NLR cut-off value for clinical decision-making requires extreme caution.

Indexed as

Leukocyte CountLymphocytesNeutrophilsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID29624591
PMCPMC5889159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.