Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29624470›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

Noninvasive vaccination against infectious diseases.

Zhichao Zheng, Diana Diaz-Arévalo, Hongbing Guan, Mingtao Zeng

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Recent advances in respiratory immunization: A focus on COVID-19 vaccines.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Zhichao Zhenga Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine , Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong , China.
Diana Diaz-Arévaloc Grupo Funcional de Inmunología , Fundación Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia-FIDIC, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario , Bogotá , DC . Colombia.
Hongbing Guana Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine , Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong , China.
Mingtao Zenga Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine , Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong , China.
Fundación Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia · COStomatology Hospital · CNTexas Tech University · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

New Vaccine against InfluenzaR01AI072139 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ZENG, MINGTAO · 2009 to 2011
$1.1M
New Therapeutic Influenza Vaccine Created by Host Cell-Restricted AttenuationR21AI133207 · NIAID · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI ZENG, MINGTAO · 2017 to 2018
$421k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072139NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI133207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of a successful vaccine, which should elicit a combination of humoral and cellular responses to control or prevent infections, is the first step in protecting against infectious diseases. A vaccine may protect against bacterial, fungal, parasitic, or viral infections in animal models, but to be effective in humans there are some issues that should be considered, such as the adjuvant, the route of vaccination, and the antigen-carrier system. While almost all licensed vaccines are injected such that inoculation is by far the most commonly used method, injection has several potential disadvantages, including pain, cross contamination, needlestick injury, under- or overdosing, and increased cost. It is also problematic for patients from rural areas of developing countries, who must travel to a hospital for vaccine administration. Noninvasive immunizations, including oral, intranasal, and transcutaneous administration of vaccines, can reduce or eliminate pain, reduce the cost of vaccinations, and increase their safety. Several preclinical and clinical studies as well as experience with licensed vaccines have demonstrated that noninvasive vaccine immunization activates cellular and humoral immunity, which protect against pathogen infections. Here we review the development of noninvasive immunization with vaccines based on live attenuated virus, recombinant adenovirus, inactivated virus, viral subunits, virus-like particles, DNA, RNA, and antigen expression in rice in preclinical and clinical studies. We predict that noninvasive vaccine administration will be more widely applied in the clinic in the near future.

Indexed as

Immunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, CutaneousAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicCommunicable Disease ControlDeveloping CountriesHospitalsHumansMiceVaccinationViral VaccinesVirus DiseasesAdjuvants, ImmunologicViral Vaccinesbacteriaclinical trialinfectious diseaseintranasalmicroneedlenoninvasiveoraltranscutaneousvaccinevirus

Identifiers

PMID29624470
PMCPMC6067898
OpenAlexW2795896481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.