Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29624207›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2018

Large differences in neonatal drug use between NICUs are common practice: time for consensus?

Robert B Flint, Floor van Beek, Peter Andriessen, Luc J Zimmermann, Kian D Liem, Irwin K M Reiss, Ronald de Groot, Dick Tibboel, David M Burger, Sinno H P Simons and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Propofol for endotracheal intubation in neonates: a dose-finding trial.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review of Drug Utilization Studies in Neonatal Units: A Global Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pharmacists in Critical Care.Innovations in pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert B FlintDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3658-594X
Floor van BeekDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter AndriessenDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Luc J ZimmermannDepartment of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Center, School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kian D LiemDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Irwin K M ReissDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald de GrootLaboratory of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dick TibboelIntensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
David M BurgerDepartment of Pharmacy and Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7279-2818
Sinno H P SimonsDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
DINO Research group
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEvidence for drug use in newborns is sparse, which may cause large differences in drug prescriptions. We aimed to investigate the differences between neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the Netherlands in currently prescribed drugs.

methodsThis multicentre study included neonates admitted during 12 months to four different NICUs. Drugs were classified in accordance with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system and assessed for on/off-label status in relation to neonatal age. The treatment protocols for four common indications for drug use were compared: pain, intubation, convulsions and hypotension.

resultsA total of 1491 neonates (GA range 23

conclusionsWe showed that drug use varies widely in neonatal clinical practice. The drug classes with the highest proportion of off-label drugs in relation to neonatal age showed the largest differences between NICUs, i.e. cardiovascular and nervous system drugs. Drug research in neonates should receive high priority to guarantee safe and appropriate medicines and optimal treatment.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription DrugsConsensusDrug TherapyHealth Care SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsOff-Label UsePractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesPrescription DrugsATC classdifferences between NICUsdrug prescriptionsneonatal intensive care unitsoff-label

Identifiers

PMID29624207
PMCPMC5980600
OpenAlexW2795574542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.