Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29624181›Full record

ArticlePhysical biology2018

Identification of gene regulation models from single-cell data.

Lisa Weber, William Raymond, Brian Munsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa WeberDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
William Raymond
Brian Munsky

Funding

Using cellular fluctuations and computational analyses to probe biological mechanismsR35GM124747 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Brian Munsky · 2017 to 2026
$3.3M
The q-bio Summer SchoolR25GM105608 · NIGMS · NEW MEXICO CONSORTIUM, INC. · PI HASTY, JEFF M, HLAVACEK, WILLIAM · 2013 to 2016
$685k
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM105608NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In quantitative analyses of biological processes, one may use many different scales of models (e.g. spatial or non-spatial, deterministic or stochastic, time-varying or at steady-state) or many different approaches to match models to experimental data (e.g. model fitting or parameter uncertainty/sloppiness quantification with different experiment designs). These different analyses can lead to surprisingly different results, even when applied to the same data and the same model. We use a simplified gene regulation model to illustrate many of these concerns, especially for ODE analyses of deterministic processes, chemical master equation and finite state projection analyses of heterogeneous processes, and stochastic simulations. For each analysis, we employ Matlab and Python software to consider a time-dependent input signal (e.g. a kinase nuclear translocation) and several model hypotheses, along with simulated single-cell data. We illustrate different approaches (e.g. deterministic and stochastic) to identify the mechanisms and parameters of the same model from the same simulated data. For each approach, we explore how uncertainty in parameter space varies with respect to the chosen analysis approach or specific experiment design. We conclude with a discussion of how our simulated results relate to the integration of experimental and computational investigations to explore signal-activated gene expression models in yeast (Neuert et al 2013 Science 339 584-7) and human cells (Senecal et al 2014 Cell Rep. 8 75-83)

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationModels, GeneticComputer SimulationGene Expression Regulation, FungalGene Regulatory NetworksHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwareStochastic ProcessesUncertaintyYeasts

Identifiers

PMID29624181
PMCPMC5996816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.