Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29624081›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2018

Metal Resurfacing Inlay Implant for Osteochondral Talar Defects After Failed Previous Surgery: A Midterm Prospective Follow-up Study.

Gwendolyn Vuurberg, Mikel L Reilingh, Christiaan J A van Bergen, Inge C M van Eekeren, Rogier M Gerards, C Niek van Dijk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Retrograde drilling for ankle joint osteochondral lesions: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Treatment of osteochondral defects: chondrointegration of metal implants improves after hydroxyapatite coating.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: are we ready for metal?Annals of translational medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gwendolyn VuurbergOrthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mikel L ReilinghAcademic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Christiaan J A van BergenAmphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Inge C M van EekerenAcademic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rogier M GerardsAcademic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C Niek van DijkAcademic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of osteochondral talar defects (OCDs) after failed previous surgery is challenging. Promising short-term results have been reported with use of a metal resurfacing inlay implant. PURPOSE: To evaluate the midterm clinical effectiveness of the metal implant for OCDs of the medial talar dome after failed previous surgery. STUDY

designCase series; Level of evidence, 4.

methodsWe prospectively studied all patients who met the inclusion criteria and received a metal resurfacing inlay implant between 2007 and 2014. The primary outcome measure was implant survival, as measured by reoperation rate. Secondary outcome measures were numeric rating scales for pain at rest and during walking, running, and stair climbing; the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS); the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle Hindfoot Scale; the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); return to work and sports; and radiographic evaluation.

resultsThis study included 38 patients with a mean age of 39 years (SD, ±13 years) and a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (SD, ±1.5 years). Two patients (5%) underwent revision surgery by means of an ankle arthrodesis (2 and 6 years postoperatively). In 8 patients, computed tomography scanning was conducted to assess postoperative complaints. These scans showed impression of the tibial plafond (n = 4), a small tibial cyst (<2.5 mm; n = 1), and cyst formation around the implant screw (n = 4). A total of 21 reoperations were performed, including medial malleolar screw removal (n = 12), arthroscopic removal of bony anterior impingement (n = 7), and calcaneal realignment osteotomy (n = 2). All secondary outcome measures improved significantly, apart from pain at rest, the FAOS symptoms subscale, and the SF-36 mental component scale. The mean time for return to sport was 4.1 months (SD, ±3 months), and 77% of patients resumed sporting activities postoperatively. Only 1 patient did not return to work postoperatively. Radiographs at final follow-up showed cyst formation (n = 2), subchondral periprosthetic radiolucency (n = 2), and non-preexisting joint space narrowing (n = 2).

conclusionThis study shows that the metal implant is an effective technique when assessed at midterm follow-up for OCDs of the medial talar dome after failed previous surgery.

Indexed as

Joint ProsthesisMetalsReoperationAdultAnkle JointFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteotomyPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesRadiographyTalusTreatment OutcomeMetalsankleimplant failureosteochondral defectresurfacing implant

Identifiers

PMID29624081
PMCPMC5985591
OpenAlexW2795375058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.