Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29623913›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2018

SNARE complex in axonal guidance and neuroregeneration.

Fausto Ulloa, Tiziana Cotrufo, Delia Ricolo, Eduardo Soriano, Sofia J Araújo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Effects ofFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  4. The role of snare proteins in cortical development.Developmental neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Environmental Enrichment Enhances CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fausto UlloaDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, School of Biology, and Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Tiziana CotrufoDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, School of Biology, and Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Delia RicoloInstitut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona (IBMB-CSIC), Parc Cientific de Barcelona; Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics, School of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eduardo SorianoDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, School of Biology, and Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid; Vall d´Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Sofia J AraújoInstitut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona (IBMB-CSIC), Parc Cientific de Barcelona; Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics, School of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat de Barcelona · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through complex mechanisms that guide axons to the appropriate routes towards their targets, axonal growth and guidance lead to neuronal system formation. These mechanisms establish the synaptic circuitry necessary for the optimal performance of the nervous system in all organisms. Damage to these networks can be repaired by neuroregenerative processes which in turn can re-establish synapses between injured axons and postsynaptic terminals. Both axonal growth and guidance and the neuroregenerative response rely on correct axonal growth and growth cone responses to guidance cues as well as correct synapses with appropriate targets. With this in mind, parallels can be drawn between axonal regeneration and processes occurring during embryonic nervous system development. However, when studying parallels between axonal development and regeneration many questions still arise; mainly, how do axons grow and synapse with their targets and how do they repair their membranes, grow and orchestrate regenerative responses after injury. Major players in the cellular and molecular processes that lead to growth cone development and movement during embryonic development are the Soluble N-ethylamaleimide Sensitive Factor (NSF) Attachment Protein Receptor (SNARE) proteins, which have been shown to be involved in axonal growth and guidance. Their involvement in axonal growth, guidance and neuroregeneration is of foremost importance, due to their roles in vesicle and membrane trafficking events. Here, we review the recent literature on the involvement of SNARE proteins in axonal growth and guidance during embryonic development and neuroregeneration.

Indexed as

axoncell membraneguidancenervous systemneuroregenerationSNAREsynaptosomal associated proteinvesicle associated membrane protein

Identifiers

PMID29623913
PMCPMC5900491
OpenAlexW2796030496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.