Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29623900›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018

Pattern separation and completion of distinct axonal inputs transmitted via micro-tunnels between co-cultured hippocampal dentate, CA3, CA1 and entorhinal cortex networks.

Daniele Poli, Bruce C Wheeler, Thomas B DeMarse, Gregory J Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Opportunities and Challenges of Brain-on-a-Chip Interfaces.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Coupling ofFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniele PoliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0071-8851
Bruce C WheelerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Thomas B DeMarseDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Gregory J BrewerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States of America.

Funding

ENGINEERING FORM AND FUNCTION IN NEURONAL NETWORKSR01NS052233 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI WHEELER, BRUCE C. · 2006 to 2016
$4.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFunctions ascribed to the hippocampal sub-regions for encoding episodic memories include the separation of activity patterns propagated from the entorhinal cortex (EC) into the dentate gyrus (DG) and pattern completion in CA3 region. Since a direct assessment of these functions is lacking at the level of specific axonal inputs, our goal is to directly measure the separation and completion of distinct axonal inputs in engineered pairs of hippocampal sub-regional circuits. APPROACH: We co-cultured EC-DG, DG-CA3, CA3-CA1 or CA1-EC neurons in a two-chamber PDMS device over a micro-electrode array (MEA60), inter-connected via distinct axons that grow through the micro-tunnels between the compartments. Taking advantage of the axonal accessibility, we quantified pattern separation and completion of the evoked activity transmitted through the tunnels from source into target well. Since pattern separation can be inferred when inputs are more correlated than outputs, we first compared the correlations among axonal inputs with those of target somata outputs. We then compared, in an analog approach, the distributions of correlation distances between rate patterns of the axonal inputs inside the tunnels with those of the somata outputs evoked in the target well. Finally, in a digital approach, we measured the spatial population distances between binary patterns of the same axonal inputs and somata outputs. MAIN

resultsWe found the strongest separation of the propagated axonal inputs when EC was axonally connected to DG, with a decline in separation to CA3 and to CA1 for both rate and digital approaches. Furthermore, the digital approach showed stronger pattern completion in CA3, then CA1 and EC. SIGNIFICANCE: To the best of our knowledge, these are the first direct measures of pattern separation and completion for axonal transmission to the somata target outputs at the rate and digital population levels in each of four stages of the EC-DG-CA3-CA1 circuit.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAxonsCA1 Region, HippocampalCA3 Region, HippocampalCoculture TechniquesDentate GyrusEntorhinal CortexMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNerve NetRats

Identifiers

PMID29623900
PMCPMC6021217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.