ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018
Pattern separation and completion of distinct axonal inputs transmitted via micro-tunnels between co-cultured hippocampal dentate, CA3, CA1 and entorhinal cortex networks.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic fluoxetine modulates perineuronal nets and inhibitory neuronal function in relation to behavioral outcomes.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Opportunities and Challenges of Brain-on-a-Chip Interfaces.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Reverse engineering of feedforward cortical-Hippocampal microcircuits for modelling neural network function and dysfunction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Robust and consistent measures of pattern separation based on information theory and demonstrated in the dentate gyrus.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Bi-Layer Platform to Study Functional Interaction between Co-Cultured Neural Networks with Unidirectional Synaptic Connectivity.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Recent Progress and Perspectives on Neural Chip Platforms Integrating PDMS-Based Microfluidic Devices and Microelectrode Arrays.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Microfluidics for Neuronal Cell and Circuit Engineering.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Apolipoprotein ε4 modifies obesity-related atrophy in the hippocampal formation of cognitively healthy adults.Neurobiology of aging · 2022Article
- Coupling ofFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Review
- Experimental Platform to Study Spiking Pattern Propagation in Modular Networks In Vitro.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- The Flow of Axonal Information Among Hippocampal Subregions: 1. Feed-Forward and Feedback Network Spatial Dynamics Underpinning Emergent Information Processing.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- µSpikeHunter: An advanced computational tool for the analysis of neuronal communication and action potential propagation in microfluidic platforms.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Experimental and Computational Methods for the Study of Cerebral Organoids: A Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFunctions ascribed to the hippocampal sub-regions for encoding episodic memories include the separation of activity patterns propagated from the entorhinal cortex (EC) into the dentate gyrus (DG) and pattern completion in CA3 region. Since a direct assessment of these functions is lacking at the level of specific axonal inputs, our goal is to directly measure the separation and completion of distinct axonal inputs in engineered pairs of hippocampal sub-regional circuits. APPROACH: We co-cultured EC-DG, DG-CA3, CA3-CA1 or CA1-EC neurons in a two-chamber PDMS device over a micro-electrode array (MEA60), inter-connected via distinct axons that grow through the micro-tunnels between the compartments. Taking advantage of the axonal accessibility, we quantified pattern separation and completion of the evoked activity transmitted through the tunnels from source into target well. Since pattern separation can be inferred when inputs are more correlated than outputs, we first compared the correlations among axonal inputs with those of target somata outputs. We then compared, in an analog approach, the distributions of correlation distances between rate patterns of the axonal inputs inside the tunnels with those of the somata outputs evoked in the target well. Finally, in a digital approach, we measured the spatial population distances between binary patterns of the same axonal inputs and somata outputs. MAIN
resultsWe found the strongest separation of the propagated axonal inputs when EC was axonally connected to DG, with a decline in separation to CA3 and to CA1 for both rate and digital approaches. Furthermore, the digital approach showed stronger pattern completion in CA3, then CA1 and EC. SIGNIFICANCE: To the best of our knowledge, these are the first direct measures of pattern separation and completion for axonal transmission to the somata target outputs at the rate and digital population levels in each of four stages of the EC-DG-CA3-CA1 circuit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.