Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29623695›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2018

A Case Series of Patients Who Underwent Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy with the Simultaneous Implant of a Penile Prosthesis: Focus on Penile Length Preservation.

Nicola Mondaini, Tommaso Cai, Enrico Sarti, Gaia Polloni, Andrea Gavazzi, Duccio Conti, Andrea Cocci, Maarten Albersen, Gianmartin Cito, Riccardo Bartoletti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Penile length preservation in penile prosthesis placement: tips & tricks.International journal of impotence research · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Penile Rehabilitation: The "Up"-date.Current sexual health reports · 2018
    Article
  7. Patient Outcomes After Penile Prosthesis Placement with Concomitant Non-Reconstructive Urologic Procedures.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicola MondainiDepartment of Urology, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5734-1725
Tommaso CaiDepartment of Urology, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7234-3526
Enrico SartiDepartment of Urology, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3765-7906
Gaia PolloniPsychologist, Como, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-5218
Andrea GavazziDepartment of Urology, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1306-9691
Duccio ContiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6556-2942
Andrea CocciDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. cocci.andrea@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-6294
Maarten AlbersenDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-6586
Gianmartin CitoDepartment of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7526-4025
Riccardo BartolettiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0021-0302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are many grey areas in the field of penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy (RP). The preservation of the full dimensions of the penis is an important consideration for improving patients' compliance for the treatment. We present the first case series of patients treated by laparoscopic extraperitoneal RP and simultaneous penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) in order to preserve the full length of the penis and to improve patients' satisfaction. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom June 2013 to June 2014, 10 patients underwent simultaneous PPI (with an AMS InhibiZone prosthesis) and RP. Patients were evaluated by means of urological visits, questionnaires, and objective measurements before surgery, at discharge from the hospital, on postoperative days 21 to 28, each 3 months for the first year, and each 6 months thereafter. The main outcome measures were biochemical recurrence-free rate, penile length, and quality of life.

resultsTen patients (mean age of 61 years; completed the study follow-up period (median, 32.2 months). No difference was found between the time of surgery and the 2-year follow-up evaluation in terms of penile length. The pre-surgery 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) median score was 97. Patients were satisfied with their penile implants, and couples' level of sexual satisfaction was rated median 8. The median postoperative SF-36 score was 99 at 3 months follow-up.

conclusionsLaparoscopic extraperitoneal RP surgery with simultaneous PPI placement seems to be an interesting possibility to propose to motivated patients for preserving the length of the penis and improving their satisfaction.

Indexed as

Erectile dysfunctionPenile prosthesisProstatectomyProstatic neoplasmsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID29623695
PMCPMC5924954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.