Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29623586›Full record

Observational studyClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2018

Comparison of plasma ctDNA and tissue/cytology-based techniques for the detection of EGFR mutation status in advanced NSCLC: Spanish data subset from ASSESS.

E Arriola, A Paredes-Lario, R García-Gomez, P Diz-Tain, M Constenla, C García-Girón, G Márquez, M Reck, G López-Vivanco

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01785888 (A Diagnostic Study of European and Japanese Advanced NSCLC Patients to Evaluate Suitable Sample Types for EGFR Testing,), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01785888 completednot on this map

A Diagnostic Study of European and Japanese Advanced NSCLC Patients to Evaluate Suitable Sample Types for EGFR Testing,

TypeobservationalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2013 to 2014Enrolled1,311ConditionsEGFR Mutation Status in aNSCLC Patients (Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Disease) With Adenocarcinoma and Non-adenocarcinoma Histologies.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

E ArriolaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. EArriola@parcdesalutmar.cat.ORCID 0000-0001-8960-7519
A Paredes-LarioMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
R García-GomezMedical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
P Diz-TainMedical Oncology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain.
M ConstenlaMedical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain.
C García-GirónMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
G MárquezMedical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Madrid, Spain.
M ReckDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany.
G López-VivancoMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain.
AstraZeneca (Spain) · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra · ESGerman Center for Lung Research · DEHospital de Cruces · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario de Burgos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in many patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) has provided the opportunity for successful treatment with specific, targeted EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, this therapeutic decision may be challenging when insufficient tumor tissue is available for EGFR mutation testing. Therefore, blood surrogate samples for EGFR mutation analysis have been suggested.

methodsData were collected from the Spanish cohort of patients in the large, non-interventional, diagnostic ASSESS study (NCT01785888) evaluating the utility of circulating free tumor-derived DNA from plasma for EGFR mutation testing. The incidence of EGFR mutation in Spain and the level of concordance between matched tissue/cytology and plasma samples were evaluated.

resultsIn a cohort of 154 eligible patients, EGFR mutations were identified in 15.1 and 11.0% of tumor and plasma samples, respectively. The most commonly used EGFR mutation testing method for the tumor tissue samples was the QIAGEN Therascreen

conclusionsThe high concordance between the different DNA sources for EGFR mutation testing supports the use of plasma samples when tumor tissue is unavailable.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNADNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySpainCirculating Tumor DNAEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsctDNAEGFR mutationLiquid biopsyNon-small-cell lung cancerPlasmaReal-world

Identifiers

PMID29623586
PMCPMC6153859
OpenAlexW2795868651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.