ReviewEnvironmental management2018
The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice.
Review in Environmental management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in methodological research: exploring challenges, tensions and learning from the perspectives of PPIE and researchers in the Realist Economic Evaluation Methods (REEM) study.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards fatty liver disease among the general population in Shanghai, China: a community-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Designing context-specific implementation strategies to improve water, sanitation, and hygiene in urban low-income settlements in Nigeria: outcome of stakeholders' collaborative approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Measuring environmental (in)justices: Insights from a systematic literature review on methodological approaches.iScience · 2025Article
- Advancements in Satellite Observations of Inland and Coastal Waters: Building Towards a Global Validation Network.Remote sensing · 2025Article
- Grasping at water: a gap-oriented approach to bridging shortfalls in freshwater biodiversity conservation.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Pilot Testing an Ecotherapy Program for Adolescence: Initial Findings and Methodological Reflections.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Increasing multi-hazard climate risk and financial and health impacts on northern homeowners.Ambio · 2024Article
- Review
- Closing the gap between science and management of cold-water refuges in rivers and streams.Global change biology · 2023Review
- Community Environment Co-Production and Environmental Satisfaction of Older Urban Residents in Shanghai, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Integration of urban science and urban climate adaptation research: opportunities to advance climate action.npj urban sustainability · 2023Review
- Toward equitable coastal community resilience: Incorporating principles of equity and justice in coastal hazard adaptation.Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures · 2023Review
- Leveraging collective action and environmental literacy to address complex sustainability challenges.Ambio · 2023Article
- Co-producing theory of change to operationalize integrated landscape approaches.Sustainability science · 2023Article
- Article
- Expanded Ethical Principles for Research Partnership and Transdisciplinary Natural Resource Management Science.Environmental management · 2021Article
- Iteratively forecasting biological invasions with PoPS and a little help from our friends.Frontiers in ecology and the environment · 2021Article
- The Use of Digital Platforms for Community-Based Monitoring.Bioscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review paper addresses the challenging question of "how to" design and implement co-production of knowledge in climate science and other environmental and agricultural sciences. Based on a grounded theory review of nine (9) published case studies of transdisciplinary and collaborative research projects, the paper offers a set of common themes regarding specific components and processes for the design, implementation, and achievement of co-production of knowledge work, which represent the "Modus Operandi" of knowledge co-production. The analysis focuses on practical methodological guidance based on lessons from how different research teams have approached the challenges of complex collaborative research. We begin by identifying broad factors or actions that inhibit or facilitate the process, then highlight specific practices associated with co-production of knowledge and necessary competencies for undertaking co-production. We provide insights on issues such as the integration of social and professional cultures, gender and social equity, and power dynamics, and illustrate the different ways in which researchers have addressed these issues. By exploring the specific practices involved in knowledge co-production, this paper provides guidance to researchers on how to navigate different possibilities of the process of conducting transdisciplinary and co-production of knowledge research projects that best fit their research context, stakeholder needs, and research team capacities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29623401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.