Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29623270›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2018

RE-AIM in Clinical, Community, and Corporate Settings: Perspectives, Strategies, and Recommendations to Enhance Public Health Impact.

Samantha M Harden, Matthew Lee Smith, Marcia G Ory, Renae L Smith-Ray, Paul A Estabrooks, Russell E Glasgow

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04601779 (INFANT HEALTH- Supporting Infants' Mental Health and Healthy Weight Development Through Community Health Nurses' Promoting Sensitive Parenting), which is not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04601779 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

INFANT HEALTH- Supporting Infants' Mental Health and Healthy Weight Development Through Community Health Nurses' Promoting Sensitive Parenting

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2021 to 2025Enrolled406ConditionsInfant Mental Health, Parenting, Parent-Child RelationsArmsVIPP-PUF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Brief, Non-Pharmacological, Interventions for Pediatric Anxiety: Meta-Analysis and Evidence Base Status.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha M HardenPhysical Activity Research and Community Implementation, Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Matthew Lee SmithCenter for Population Health and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Marcia G OryCenter for Population Health and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Renae L Smith-RayWalgreens Center for Health and Wellbeing Research, Deerfield, IL, United States.
Paul A EstabrooksDepartment of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Russell E GlasgowDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, IL, United States.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RIZZO, MATTHEW · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
IMPlementation to Achieve Clinical Transformation (IMPACT): The Colorado Training ProgramK12HL137862 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GLASGOW, RUSSELL E, HAVRANEK, EDWARD PAUL · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL137862NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RE-AIM Framework is a planning and evaluation model that has been used in a variety of settings to address various programmatic, environmental, and policy innovations for improving population health. In addition to the broad application and diverse use of the framework, there are lessons learned and recommendations for the future use of the framework across clinical, community, and corporate settings. The purposes of this article are to: (A) provide a brief overview of the RE-AIM Framework and its pragmatic use for planning and evaluation; (B) offer recommendations to facilitate the application of RE-AIM in clinical, community, and corporate settings; and (C) share perspectives and lessons learned about employing RE-AIM dimensions in the planning, implementation, and evaluation phases within these different settings. In this article, we demonstrate how the RE-AIM concepts and elements within each dimension can be applied by researchers and practitioners in diverse settings, among diverse populations and for diverse health topics.

Indexed as

dissemination and implementation researchevaluation frameworkhealth promotionimplementation scienceknowledge transfertranslation

Identifiers

PMID29623270
PMCPMC5874302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.