ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2018
Collaborative Comanagement Between Neurohospitalists and Internal Medicine Hospitalists Decreases Provider Costs and Enhances Satisfaction With Neurology Care at an Academic Medical Center.
Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of urgent inpatient neurologic consultations in a large tertiary hospital center: Follow-up on the effect of standardized training of residents.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Outcomes of a Neurohospitalist Program at an Academic Medical Center.The Neurohospitalist · 2022Article
- Implementing a Neurohospitalist Program Improves Stroke Care Metrics and Patient Satisfaction Scores.The Neurohospitalist · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe majority of academic medical centers are moving to a neurohospitalist model of care for hospital neurology coverage. Potential benefits over a more traditional academic model of patient care include greater expertise in acute neurologic disease, increased efficiency, and improved availability to patients, providers, and learners. Despite these perceived advantages, switching to a neurohospitalist model can come at substantial financial cost, so finding ways to maximize the positive impact of a limited number of neurohospitalists is very important to the future health of academic neurology departments. Over the past 7 years, we have implemented a model for inpatient neurological care based on an intimate collaborative relationship between the neurology and hospital medicine services at our main academic hospital. Our goal was to optimize the value of care by decreasing cost while improving quality.
methodsCost and revenue associated with professional services was evaluated on a yearly basis. As part of ongoing quality improvement efforts, yearly surveys were administered to referring providers during the transition to a collaborative care model in which NHs and medicine hospitalists comanage neurology inpatients.
resultsNet operating loss was dramatically decreased upon transition to the new care model. Concomitantly, there was a robust positive impact on perception of overall quality, timeliness, and communication skills of neurology services.
conclusionsCollaborative comanagement is an effective strategy to improve overall satisfaction with neurology services at a tertiary academic medical center while maintaining financial viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.