Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29623081›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2018

A New

Loulieta Nazerai, Amalie Skak Schøller, Peter Overbeck Sharma Rasmussen, Søren Buus, Anette Stryhn, Jan Pravsgaard Christensen, Allan Randrup Thomsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Thermal Inactivation of Carcasses of Mice and Rabbits Infected with Pathogens of Risk Groups Two to Four.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Loulieta NazeraiDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amalie Skak SchøllerDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter Overbeck Sharma RasmussenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren BuusDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anette StryhnDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jan Pravsgaard ChristensenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Allan Randrup ThomsenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between recent Zika virus (ZIKV) infection and neurological complications, microcephaly in the fetus, and Guillain-Barré syndrome in adults underscores the necessity for a protective vaccine. Rational vaccine development requires an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms which could protect against infection with this virus. However, so far, such an analysis has been hampered by the absence of a suitable small animal model. Unlike the situation in humans, ZIKV only replicates effectively in the peripheral organs of mice, if type I IFN signaling is interrupted. As type I IFN also impacts the adaptive immune response, mice with such a defect are not optimal for a comprehensive immunological analysis. In this report, we show that even in wild-type (WT) mice i.c. infection with low doses of virus causes marked local virus replication and lethal encephalitis in naïve mice. Furthermore, peripheral infection of WT mice with low doses of virus induces a significant immune response, which provides long-lasting protection of WT mice from a fatal outcome of subsequent i.c. challenge. Therefore, combining peripheral priming with later i.c. challenge represents a new approach for studying the adaptive immune response to ZIKV in mice with an intact type I IFN response. In this study, we focused on the mechanisms underlying resistance to reinfection. Using a combination of adoptive transfer, antibody-based cell depletion, and gene targeting, we show that the key protective factor in type I IFN replete mice is humoral immunity. CD8 T cells are not essential in mice with preformed specific antibodies, but under conditions where initial antibody levels are low, effector CD8 T cells may play a role as a back-up system. These results have important implications for our understanding of natural immunity to ZIKV infection and for Zika vaccine design.

Indexed as

ImmunitySignal TransductionAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCell LineDisease Models, AnimalDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunizationInterferon Type IMiceMice, KnockoutModels, BiologicalT-Lymphocyte SubsetsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralInterferon Type Iadaptive immunityB cellsmemorymouse modelprotectionT cellsZika virus

Identifiers

PMID29623081
PMCPMC5874300
OpenAlexW2792422559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.