ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2018
Development of a Membrane-Based Method for Isolation of Genomic DNA from Human Blood.
Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of paper-based nucleic acid extraction materials for point-of-care testing applications.Cellulose (London, England) · 2022Article
- A method for improving the efficiency of DNA extraction from clotted blood samples.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High quality and sufficient quantity of genomic DNA (gDNA) are the primary requisites of several molecular biologic applications, including clinical studies related to genetics, genomics, gene polymorphism, and DNA fingerprinting. Whole blood is the primary source of gDNA in most of the clinical investigations. Currently, commercial kits are primarily used to achieve these goals. However, the use of kits is limited by the cost and involvement of several centrifugal steps. Other methods reported are either laborious or do not produce high quality or quantity of gDNA or both. Here, we present the data on the development of a centrifugation-free, cost-effective, and user-friendly method for the isolation of human gDNA from the buffy coat of human blood that involves limited numbers of steps with about 15 min of hands-on time per sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.