ArticleThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2017
Effect of chronic pretreatment with beta-blockers on no-reflow phenomenon in diabetic patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The predictors of no reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.Indian heart journal · 2018Pooled it
- Advances in Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon-a Contemporary Review.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2018Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNo-reflow is an important factor as it predicts a poor outcome in patients undergoing primary angioplasty. In comparison with patients attaining TIMI 3 flow, patients with no-reflow have an increased incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, early congestive cardiac failure, cardiac rupture and cardiac death. As such, it is of paramount importance to consider strategies to prevent the occurrence of no-reflow phenomenon. Previous evidence suggests that Beta (β) blockers have multiple favorable effects on the vascular system not directly related to their effect on blood pressure. However, there are insufficient data regarding the effects of prior Beta blocker use on coronary blood flow after primary PCI in patients with AMI.
aimThe aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that Beta blocker treatment before admission would have beneficial effects on the development of the no-reflow phenomenon after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND
resultsThe study included 107 diabetic patients who had presented with acute STEMI within 12 h from the onset of chest pain. All of them have undergone primary angioplasty at Ain Shams University hospitals or National Heart institute. The incidence of no-reflow phenomenon was 21%. No-reflow phenomenon was significantly lower in patients on chronic B-blocker therapy (12% vs. 28%;
conclusionChronic pre-treatment with B-blocker in diabetic patients presenting with STEMI, is associated with lower rate of occurrence of no-reflow phenomenon after primary PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.