Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29622808›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2018

Expert consensus document: Advances in the diagnosis and classification of gastric and intestinal motility disorders.

Jutta Keller, Gabrio Bassotti, John Clarke, Phil Dinning, Mark Fox, Madhusudan Grover, Per M Hellström, Meiyun Ke, Peter Layer, Carolina Malagelada and 7 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. European guideline on indications, performance and clinical impact ofUnited European gastroenterology journal · 2021
    Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jutta KellerIsraelitic Hospital, Academic Hospital University of Hamburg, Orchideenstieg 14, 22297 Hamburg, Germany.
Gabrio BassottiUniversity of Perugia, Piazza dell'Università, 1, 06121 Perugia, Italy.
John ClarkeStanford University, 900 Blake Wilbur Dr, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Phil DinningFlinders Medical Centre, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Mark FoxUniversity Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland, and St. Claraspital, Kleinriehenstrasse 30, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Madhusudan GroverMayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
Per M HellströmUppsala University Hospital, Building 40, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Meiyun KePeking Union Medical College Hospital, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Peter LayerIsraelitic Hospital, Academic Hospital University of Hamburg, Orchideenstieg 14, 22297 Hamburg, Germany.
Carolina MalageladaUniversity of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Henry P ParkmanTemple University Hospital, 3401 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
S Mark ScottQueen Mary University of London, The Wingate Institute, 26 Ashfield Street, Whitechapel, London E1 2AJ, UK.
Jan TackUniversity Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Magnus SimrenSahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Blå stråket 5, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hans TörnblomSahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Blå stråket 5, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Michael CamilleriMayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function

Funding

"Barrier function alterations in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome"K23DK103911 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GROVER, MADHUSUDAN · 2015 to 2019
$804k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK103911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disturbances of gastric, intestinal and colonic motor and sensory functions affect a large proportion of the population worldwide, impair quality of life and cause considerable health-care costs. Assessment of gastrointestinal motility in these patients can serve to establish diagnosis and to guide therapy. Major advances in diagnostic techniques during the past 5-10 years have led to this update about indications for and selection and performance of currently available tests. As symptoms have poor concordance with gastrointestinal motor dysfunction, clinical motility testing is indicated in patients in whom there is no evidence of causative mucosal or structural diseases such as inflammatory or malignant disease. Transit tests using radiopaque markers, scintigraphy, breath tests and wireless motility capsules are noninvasive. Other tests of gastrointestinal contractility or sensation usually require intubation, typically represent second-line investigations limited to patients with severe symptoms and are performed at only specialized centres. This Consensus Statement details recommended tests as well as useful clinical alternatives for investigation of gastric, small bowel and colonic motility. The article provides recommendations on how to classify gastrointestinal motor disorders on the basis of test results and describes how test results guide treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MotilityGastric EmptyingGastrointestinal DiseasesHumans

Identifiers

PMID29622808
PMCPMC6646879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.