Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29622702›Full record

ReviewBMJ case reports2018

Perforated gastric remnant ulcer after laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Lu Dai, Mihir M Shah, Steven Rosenblatt

Open access · greenAbstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lu DaiCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mihir M ShahSurgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4665-5534
Steven RosenblattDepartment of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ulcer perforation in the excluded stomach and duodenum is a rare complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Pathogenesis of these ulcers are multifactorial. We report a case of perforated gastric remnant ulcer in a 54-year-old woman who had undergone a laparoscopic RYGB 5 years previously. The perforation was successfully repaired with an omental patch. We also present a review of the literature of similar cases.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleGastric BypassGastric StumpHumansMiddle AgedPeptic UlcerPeptic Ulcer PerforationPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationTime FactorsTreatment Outcomebariatric surgerygastric remnantgastric remnant ulcermarginal ulcerperforation of gastric remnantRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID29622702
PMCPMC5893952
OpenAlexW2796074930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.