Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29622685›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open2018

Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab in the FOURIER study: a Canadian analysis.

Todd C Lee, Mohammed Kaouache, Steven A Grover

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cost-effectiveness of Evolocumab in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  5. Vulnerable Plaque, Characteristics, Detection, and Potential Therapies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Todd C LeeAffiliations: Division of General Internal Medicine (Lee, Grover), Department of Medicine, McGill University; Clinical Practice Assessment Unit (Lee), McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Department of General Sciences (Kaouache), Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Centre for the Analysis of Cost-Effective Care (Grover), Montreal General Hospital, Montréal, Que.
Mohammed KaouacheAffiliations: Division of General Internal Medicine (Lee, Grover), Department of Medicine, McGill University; Clinical Practice Assessment Unit (Lee), McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Department of General Sciences (Kaouache), Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Centre for the Analysis of Cost-Effective Care (Grover), Montreal General Hospital, Montréal, Que.
Steven A GroverAffiliations: Division of General Internal Medicine (Lee, Grover), Department of Medicine, McGill University; Clinical Practice Assessment Unit (Lee), McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que.; Department of General Sciences (Kaouache), Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Centre for the Analysis of Cost-Effective Care (Grover), Montreal General Hospital, Montréal, Que.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvolocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, has been shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein levels by up to 60%. Despite the absence of a reduction in overall or cardiovascular mortality in the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial, some believe that, with longer treatment, such a benefit might eventually be realized. Our aim was to estimate the potential mortality benefit over a patient's lifetime and the cost per year of life saved (YOLS) for an average Canadian with established coronary artery disease. We also sought to estimate the price threshold at which evolocumab might be considered cost-effective for secondary prevention in Canada.

methodsWe calibrated the Cardio-metabolic Model, a well-validated tool for predicting cardiovascular events and life expectancy, to the reduction in nonfatal events seen in the FOURIER trial. Assuming that long-term treatment will eventually result in mortality benefits, we estimated YOLSs and cost per YOLS with evolocumab treatment plus a statin compared to a statin alone. We then estimated the annual drug costs that would provide a 50% chance of being cost-effective at willingness-to-pay values of $50 000 and $100 000.

resultsIn secondary prevention in patients similar to those in the FOURIER study, evolocumab treatment would save an average of 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.41) life-years at a cost of $101 899 (95% CI $97 325-$106 473), yielding a cost per YOLS of $299 482. We estimate that to have a 50% probability of achieving a cost per YOLS below $50 000 and $100 000 would require annual drug costs below $1200 and $2300, respectively.

interpretationAt current pricing, the use of evolocumab for secondary prevention is unlikely to be cost-effective in Canada.

Identifiers

PMID29622685
PMCPMC7869663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.