Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29622556›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Accuracy of CT Angiography for Differentiating Pseudo-Occlusion from True Occlusion or High-Grade Stenosis of the Extracranial ICA in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective MR CLEAN Substudy.

M Kappelhof, H A Marquering, O A Berkhemer, J Borst, A van der Lugt, W H van Zwam, J A Vos, G Lycklama À Nijeholt, C B L M Majoie, B J Emmer and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

M KappelhofFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.K., H.A.M., O.A.B., J.B., C.B.L.M.M, B.J.E.).ORCID 0000-0001-5250-8955
H A MarqueringFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.K., H.A.M., O.A.B., J.B., C.B.L.M.M, B.J.E.).ORCID 0000-0002-1414-6313
O A BerkhemerFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.K., H.A.M., O.A.B., J.B., C.B.L.M.M, B.J.E.).ORCID 0000-0002-2212-6128
J BorstFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.K., H.A.M., O.A.B., J.B., C.B.L.M.M, B.J.E.).ORCID 0000-0002-5501-822X
A van der LugtDepartments of Radiology (A.v.d.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-6159-2228
W H van ZwamDepartment of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-7056
J A VosDepartment of Radiology (J.A.V.), St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3614-9168
G Lycklama À NijeholtDepartment of Radiology (G.L.à.N.), Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6575-9868
C B L M MajoieFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.K., H.A.M., O.A.B., J.B., C.B.L.M.M, B.J.E.).ORCID 0000-0002-7600-9568
B J EmmerFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.K., H.A.M., O.A.B., J.B., C.B.L.M.M, B.J.E.) b.j.emmer@amc.uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8462-4037
MR CLEAN Investigators
MACOM (United States) · USMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLResearch Institute of Radiology · BYSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe absence of opacification on CTA in the extracranial ICA in acute ischemic stroke may be caused by atherosclerotic occlusion, dissection, or pseudo-occlusion. The latter is explained by sluggish or stagnant flow in a patent artery caused by a distal intracranial occlusion. This study aimed to explore the accuracy of CTA for differentiating pseudo-occlusion from true occlusion of the extracranial ICA. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients from the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) with an apparent ICA occlusion on CTA and available DSA images were included. Two independent observers classified CTA images as atherosclerotic cause (occlusion/high-grade stenosis), dissection, or suspected pseudo-occlusion. Pseudo-occlusion was suspected if CTA showed a gradual contrast decline located above the level of the carotid bulb, especially in the presence of an occluded intracranial ICA bifurcation (T-occlusion). DSA images, classified into the same 3 categories, were used as the criterion standard.

resultsIn 108 of 476 patients (23%), CTA showed an apparent extracranial carotid occlusion. DSA was available in 46 of these, showing an atherosclerotic cause in 13 (28%), dissection in 16 (35%), and pseudo-occlusion in 17 (37%). The sensitivity for detecting pseudo-occlusion on CTA was 82% (95% CI, 57-96) for both observers; specificity was 76% (95% CI, 56-90) and 86% (95% CI, 68-96) for observers 1 and 2, respectively. The κ value for interobserver agreement was .77, indicating substantial agreement. T-occlusions were more frequent in pseudo- than true occlusions (82% versus 21%,

conclusionsOn CTA, extracranial ICA pseudo-occlusions can be differentiated from true carotid occlusions.

Indexed as

AgedBrain IschemiaCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid StenosisComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansIntracranial ArteriosclerosisMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityStroke

Identifiers

PMID29622556
PMCPMC7410653
OpenAlexW2796145298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.