Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29621615›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Statistical power comparisons at 3T and 7T with a GO / NOGO task.

Salvatore Torrisi, Gang Chen, Daniel Glen, Peter A Bandettini, Chris I Baker, Richard Reynolds, Jeffrey Yen-Ting Liu, Joseph Leshin, Nicholas Balderston, Christian Grillon and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00047853 (fMRI Investigation of Explicit Cue and Contextual Fear), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00047853 nacompletednot on this map

fMRI Investigation of Explicit Cue and Contextual Fear

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Ran2002 to 2022Enrolled1,080ConditionsAnxiety Disorders, FearArmsShock device, Acoustic startle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Online self-evaluation of fMRI-based neurofeedback performance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Posterior Cingulate Cortex Reflects the Impact of Anxiety on Drift Rates During Cognitive Processing.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Salvatore TorrisiSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States. Electronic address: sam.torrisi@nih.gov.
Gang ChenScientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.
Daniel GlenScientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.
Peter A BandettiniSection on Functional Imaging Methods, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.
Chris I BakerSection on Learning and Plasticity, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.
Richard ReynoldsScientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.
Jeffrey Yen-Ting LiuSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.
Joseph LeshinSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.
Nicholas BalderstonSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.
Christian GrillonSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.
Monique ErnstSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, NIMH, Bethesda MD, United States.

Funding

Functional MRI Method DevelopmentZIAMH002783 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BANDETTINI, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$38.4M
Scientific and Statistical Computing CoreZICMH002888 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI TAYLOR, PAUL · 2009 to 2025
$30.9M
The Psychophysiology Of Fear And AnxietyZIAMH002798 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI GRILLON, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2022
$29.0M
Object, face, body and scene representations in the human brainZIAMH002909 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BAKER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2025
$25.5M
The Psychophysiology Of Fear And AnxietyZ01MH002798 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI GRILLON, CHRISTIAN · 2002 to 2008
$3.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 MH002798Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002798Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MH002888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of cognitive neuroscience is weighing evidence about whether to move from standard field strength to ultra-high field (UHF). The present study contributes to the evidence by comparing a cognitive neuroscience paradigm at 3 Tesla (3T) and 7 Tesla (7T). The goal was to test and demonstrate the practical effects of field strength on a standard GO/NOGO task using accessible preprocessing and analysis tools. Two independent matched healthy samples (N = 31 each) were analyzed at 3T and 7T. Results show gains at 7T in statistical strength, the detection of smaller effects and group-level power. With an increased availability of UHF scanners, these gains may be exploited by cognitive neuroscientists and other neuroimaging researchers to develop more efficient or comprehensive experimental designs and, given the same sample size, achieve greater statistical power at 7T.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalAdultBrainExecutive FunctionFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging7 TeslaCognitive neuroscienceGroup studiesUHF

Identifiers

PMID29621615
PMCPMC5960626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.