ArticleJournal of vision2018
Binocular summation for reflexive eye movements.
Article in Journal of vision, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saccadic Reaction Times and Computational Modelling Reveal Heterogeneous Binocular Summation in Glaucomatous Visual Fields.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Integration of Visual Motion Signals in Reduced Visual Conditions.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- High-Resolution Eye-Tracking System for Accurate Measurement of Short-Latency Ocular Following Responses: Development and Observational Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2024Article
- Ocular-following responses to broadband visual stimuli of varying motion coherence.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Weighted power summation and contrast normalization mechanisms account for short-latency eye movements to motion and disparity of sine-wave gratings and broadband visual stimuli in humans.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Recording of Ocular-Following Responses in Children: A Promising Tool for Stereo Deficiency Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Different rules for binocular combination of luminance flicker in cortical and subcortical pathways.eLife · 2023Article
- Refining Clinical Quantification of Depth of Suppression in Amblyopia through Synoptophore Measurement.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of SMILE Combined with Micro-Monovision in Presbyopic Patients: A Pilot Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Ocular-following responses in school-age children.PloS one · 2022Article
- Interocular velocity cues elicit vergence eye movements in mice.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Binocular Summation for Reflexive Eye Movements: A Potential Diagnostic Tool for Stereodeficiencies.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychophysical studies and our own subjective experience suggest that, in natural viewing conditions (i.e., at medium to high contrasts), monocularly and binocularly viewed scenes appear very similar, with the exception of the improved depth perception provided by stereopsis. This phenomenon is usually described as a lack of binocular summation. We show here that there is an exception to this rule: Ocular following eye movements induced by the sudden motion of a large stimulus, which we recorded from three human subjects, are much larger when both eyes see the moving stimulus, than when only one eye does. We further discovered that this binocular advantage is a function of the interocular correlation between the two monocular images: It is maximal when they are identical, and reduced when the two eyes are presented with different images. This is possible only if the neurons that underlie ocular following are sensitive to binocular disparity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.