Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29621341›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Second course of stereotactic radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases: Safety and efficacy.

Juliette Moreau, Toufic Khalil, Guillaume Dupic, Emmanuel Chautard, Jean-Jacques Lemaire, Florian Magnier, Véronique Dedieu, Michel Lapeyre, Pierre Verrelle, Julian Biau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Efficacy of salvage stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for locally recurrent brain metastases after initial SRT and characteristics of target population.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Juliette MoreauRadiotherapy Department, Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Toufic KhalilNeurosurgery Department, Clermont-Ferrand Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Guillaume DupicRadiotherapy Department, Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Emmanuel ChautardRadiotherapy Department, Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jean-Jacques LemaireNeurosurgery Department, Clermont-Ferrand Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Florian MagnierMedical Physics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Véronique DedieuUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 IMoST, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Michel LapeyreRadiotherapy Department, Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pierre VerrelleRadiotherapy Department, Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Julian BiauRadiotherapy Department, Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1570-4487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, we have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of repeated brain metastases (BM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS2) following local failure of a prior radiosurgical procedure (SRS1). Between December 1996 and August 2015, 30 patients with 36 BM underwent SRS2 with a median dose of 18Gy. All BM were located outside critical structures. Following SRS2, local control at 6 months and one year were respectively 82.9% (IC 95%: 67.6-91.9) and 67.8% (IC 95%: 51-81). On multivariate analysis, planning target volume (PTV) < 3cc (HR: 0.19 (0.1-0.52)) and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) prior to SRS2 (HR: 0.25 (0.1-0.64)) were significantly associated with a better local control. One- and two-year overall survival rates after SRS2 were respectively 65.5% (IC 95%: 47.3-80%) and 27.6% (IC 95%: 14.7-45.7). Median overall survival following SRS2 was 14.2 months (range 1-106). Nineteen (63%) patients died from progressive systemic disease. Three (10%) patients died from out-field progressive brain disease and 8 (27%) in-field. Concerning toxicities, edema, radionecrosis, and hemorrhages were identified in 5 (12.8%), 4 (10.2%), and 5 (12.8%) patients respectively. No toxicity resulted in a neurological deficit. On univariate analysis, toxicities were significantly associated with PTV > 7cc (p = 0.02) and all patients had a WBRT before SRS2. A second course of SRS for locally recurrent brain metastases showed encouraging rates of local control. This treatment led to acceptable toxicities, especially for brain metastases smaller than 7cc, in our selected cohort of patients with BM located outside critical structures. Further studies are needed.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryRe-IrradiationSalvage TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsCranial IrradiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID29621341
PMCPMC5886580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.