Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29621319›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Dosimetric impact of intra-fraction prostate motion under a tumour-tracking system in hypofractionated robotic radiosurgery.

Yuhei Koike, Iori Sumida, Hirokazu Mizuno, Hiroya Shiomi, Keita Kurosu, Seiichi Ota, Yasuo Yoshioka, Osamu Suzuki, Keisuke Tamari, Kazuhiko Ogawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuhei KoikeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Iori SumidaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7669-0325
Hirokazu MizunoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroya ShiomiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Keita KurosuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Seiichi OtaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuo YoshiokaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Osamu SuzukiDepartment of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Keisuke TamariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhiko OgawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For CyberKnife-mediated prostate cancer treatment, a tumour-tracking approach is applied to correct the target location by acquiring X-ray images of implanted fiducial markers intermittently. This study investigated the dosimetric impact of intra-fraction prostate motion during CyberKnife treatment. We retrospectively analyzed 16 patients treated using the CyberKnife (35 Gy delivered in five fractions). Using log files of recorded prostate motion, the intra-fraction prostate motion was simulated. We defined the worst-case intra-fraction prostate motion as the difference between pre- and post-deviation on log files and shifted structure sets according to the corresponding offsets for each beam. The dose-volume indices were calculated and compared with the original plan in terms of clinical target volume (CTV), planning target volume (CTV plus a 2-mm margin), rectum, bladder, and urethra. Prostate motions of >3, >5, and >10 mm were observed for 31.3, 9.1, and 0.5% of the 1929 timestamps, respectively. Relative differences between the simulated and original plans were mostly less than 1%. Although significant decreases were observed in D50% and D98% of the target, absolute dose differences were <0.1 Gy compared with the planned dose. The dosimetric impact of intra-fraction prostate motion may be small even with longer treatment durations, indicating that the tumour tracking using the CyberKnife could be a robust system for examining prostate motion.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationFiducial MarkersHumansMaleProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRadiometryRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRectumRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID29621319
PMCPMC5886484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.