Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29621317›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Muscular and metabolic responses to different Nordic walking techniques, when style matters.

Barbara Pellegrini, Gennaro Boccia, Chiara Zoppirolli, Raffaela Rosa, Federico Stella, Lorenzo Bortolan, Alberto Rainoldi, Federico Schena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Do poles save energy during steep uphill walking?European journal of applied physiology · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara PellegriniCeRiSM Research Centre "Sport, Mountain, and Health", Rovereto, (TN), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-2632
Gennaro BocciaCeRiSM Research Centre "Sport, Mountain, and Health", Rovereto, (TN), Italy.
Chiara ZoppirolliCeRiSM Research Centre "Sport, Mountain, and Health", Rovereto, (TN), Italy.
Raffaela RosaDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, (VR), Italy.
Federico StellaCeRiSM Research Centre "Sport, Mountain, and Health", Rovereto, (TN), Italy.
Lorenzo BortolanCeRiSM Research Centre "Sport, Mountain, and Health", Rovereto, (TN), Italy.
Alberto RainoldiNeuroMuscularFunction | Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, (TO), Italy.
Federico SchenaCeRiSM Research Centre "Sport, Mountain, and Health", Rovereto, (TN), Italy.
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to poling action and upper body engagement, Nordic walking (NW) has additional health benefits with respect to conventional walking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in muscle activation and metabolic responses between NW, performed with the technique suggested by NW instructors, and with some modifications in the way to move upper limb and poles. Ten NW instructors volunteered to walk on a treadmill at 5.5 km•h-1 in five conditions: walking (W), Nordic walking (NW), NW with a weak poling action (NWweak), with straight-upper limbs moving the shoulders (NWshoulder) and with elbow flexion-extension pattern and shoulder freezed (NWelbow). Poling forces, body segments and poles movement, upper and lower body muscle activation, as well as metabolic parameters were measured.All modified NW techniques elicited lower muscular activation and metabolic responses with respect to the suggested NW technique (P < 0.05). All NW techniques elicited higher muscular activation and metabolic responses than W. All parameters observed with the NWweak were lower than NW. A decreased activation of shoulder extensor muscles and increased activation of anterior deltoid muscle were the main features of NWshoulder. Lower triceps brachii muscle activation and reduced propulsive poling action with respect to NW were seen for NWelbow, resulting also in shorter steps.Nordic walking instructors, sport technicians and practitioners should be aware that any deviation from the technique usually suggested might lead to lower benefits. However it is worth to note that any walking technique with poles elicits higher metabolic responses and muscular activation than walking.

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyExerciseExercise TestFemaleGaitHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalOxygen ConsumptionPhysical ExertionWalking

Identifiers

PMID29621317
PMCPMC5886538
OpenAlexW2796189139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.