ArticlePloS one2018
Assessing the validity of a data driven segmentation approach: A 4 year longitudinal study of healthcare utilization and mortality.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mapping Healthcare Needs: A Systematic Review of Population Stratification Tools.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Population segmentation based on healthcare needs: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of the clinical application of data-driven population segmentation analysis.BMC medical research methodology · 2018Pooled it
- Systemic Population Segmentation Based on the Unified Care Model: An Approach to Health System Transformation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- How predictive of future healthcare utilisation and mortality is data-driven population segmentation based on healthcare utilisation and chronic condition comorbidity?BMC public health · 2024Article
- Applying a data-driven population segmentation approach in German claims data.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Development of a real-world database for asthma and COPD: The SingHealth-Duke-NUS-GSK COPD and Asthma Real-World Evidence (SDG-CARE) collaboration.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Article
- Identifying common patterns of health services use: a longitudinal study of older Swiss adults' care trajectories.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Clinical Outcome and Utilization Profiles Among Latent Groups of High-Risk Patients: Moving from Segmentation Towards Intervention.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Empiric segmentation of high-risk patients: a structured literature review.The American journal of managed care · 2022Review
- Profiles and predictors of healthcare utilization: using a cluster-analytic approach to identify typical users across conventional, allied and complementary medicine, and self-care.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Ambulatory Healthcare Use Profiles of Patients With Diabetes and Their Association With Quality of Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Early Implementation of a Patient-Centered Medical Home in Singapore: A Qualitative Study Using Theory on Diffusion of Innovations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Population segmentation of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and its clinical applications - a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Discovering healthcare provider behavior patterns through the lens of Medicare excess charge.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Moving Beyond Simple Risk Prediction: Segmenting Patient Populations Using Consumer Data.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Tailoring integrated care services for high-risk patients with multiple chronic conditions: a risk stratification approach using cluster analysis.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Population segments as a tool for health care performance reporting: an exploratory study in the Canadian province of British Columbia.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Can cluster analyses of linked healthcare data identify unique population segments in a general practice-registered population?BMC public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSegmentation of heterogeneous patient populations into parsimonious and relatively homogenous groups with similar healthcare needs can facilitate healthcare resource planning and development of effective integrated healthcare interventions for each segment. We aimed to apply a data-driven, healthcare utilization-based clustering analysis to segment a regional health system patient population and validate its discriminative ability on 4-year longitudinal healthcare utilization and mortality data.
methodsWe extracted data from the Singapore Health Services Electronic Health Intelligence System, an electronic medical record database that included healthcare utilization (inpatient admissions, specialist outpatient clinic visits, emergency department visits, and primary care clinic visits), mortality, diseases, and demographics for all adult Singapore residents who resided in and had a healthcare encounter with our regional health system in 2012. Hierarchical clustering analysis (Ward's linkage) and K-means cluster analysis using age and healthcare utilization data in 2012 were applied to segment the selected population. These segments were compared using their demographics (other than age) and morbidities in 2012, and longitudinal healthcare utilization and mortality from 2013-2016.
resultsAmong 146,999 subjects, five distinct patient segments "Young, healthy"; "Middle age, healthy"; "Stable, chronic disease"; "Complicated chronic disease" and "Frequent admitters" were identified. Healthcare utilization patterns in 2012, morbidity patterns and demographics differed significantly across all segments. The "Frequent admitters" segment had the smallest number of patients (1.79% of the population) but consumed 69% of inpatient admissions, 77% of specialist outpatient visits, 54% of emergency department visits, and 23% of primary care clinic visits in 2012. 11.5% and 31.2% of this segment has end stage renal failure and malignancy respectively. The validity of cluster-analysis derived segments is supported by discriminative ability for longitudinal healthcare utilization and mortality from 2013-2016. Incident rate ratios for healthcare utilization and Cox hazards ratio for mortality increased as patient segments increased in complexity. Patients in the "Frequent admitters" segment accounted for a disproportionate healthcare utilization and 8.16 times higher mortality rate.
conclusionOur data-driven clustering analysis on a general patient population in Singapore identified five patient segments with distinct longitudinal healthcare utilization patterns and mortality risk to provide an evidence-based segmentation of a regional health system's healthcare needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.