Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29621263›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Wide scan imaging with swept-source optical coherent tomography for glaucoma diagnosis.

Eun Hee Hong, Yong Un Shin, Min Ho Kang, Heeyoon Cho, Mincheol Seong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eun Hee HongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yong Un ShinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Min Ho KangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Heeyoon ChoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Mincheol SeongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7912-0096
Hanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine glaucoma-discriminating abilities of macular and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness measurements of wide scan (12X9mm) using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) compared to measurements of standard macula and disc scans (6 X 6 mm).

methodsThis retrospective chart review study included 60 glaucomatous and 62 healthy eyes of total 122 subjects who visited a glaucoma clinic and were examined with wide, standard macula, and standard disc scans of SS-OCT (DRI-OCT-1 Atlantis; Topcon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) on the same day. Thickness measurements of the ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL), mGCIPL plus nerve fiber layer (mGCC), and total retinal layer (TRL) were assessed in wide and standard macula scans. Thickness measurements of cpRNFL were assessed in wide and standard disc scans. The repeatability and agreement of measurements taken in each scan were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The abilities of parameters to discriminate between glaucoma and normal groups were assessed using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).

resultsThe repeatability and agreement of all parameters showed high ICC values (all ≥ 0.800). AUCs for mGCIPL thickness were 0.710-0.847 and 0.701-0.836 in standard macula and wide scans, respectively. AUCs for cpRNFL thickness were 0.749-0.902 and 0.726-0.897 in standard disc and wide scans, respectively. There were no significant differences in AUCs between wide and standard scans.

conclusionsThe agreement between SS-OCT wide and standard scans for mGCIPL, mGCC and cpRNFL measurements were excellent. As the glaucoma-discriminating ability of wide scans was comparable to that of standard macula/disc scans, a single wide scan can replace separate standard macula/disc scans for evaluating glaucoma.

Indexed as

Tomography, Optical CoherenceAdultAgedArea Under CurveCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlaucomaHumansMacula LuteaMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetinal Ganglion CellsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29621263
PMCPMC5886522
OpenAlexW2796290784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.