Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29621261›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of individualized occupational therapy for patients with schizophrenia in Japan.

Takeshi Shimada, Manami Ohori, Yusuke Inagaki, Yuko Shimooka, Naoya Sugimura, Ikuyo Ishihara, Tomotaka Yoshida, Masayoshi Kobayashi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takeshi ShimadaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Medical Corporation Seitaikai, Mental Support Soyokaze Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
Manami OhoriDepartment of Occupational Therapy, North Alps Medical Center, Azumi Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
Yusuke InagakiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Nagano Prefectural Mental Wellness Center Komagane, Nagano, Japan.
Yuko ShimookaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Social Medical Corporation Ritsuzankai, Iida Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
Naoya SugimuraDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Medical Corporation Akitsukai, Nanshin Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
Ikuyo IshiharaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Medical Corporation Aiseikai, Matsuoka Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
Tomotaka YoshidaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Medical Corporation Seitaikai, Mental Support Soyokaze Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
Masayoshi KobayashiDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8770-1912
Shinshu University · JPAzumi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The individualized occupational therapy (IOT) program is a psychosocial program that we developed to facilitate proactive participation in treatment and improve cognitive functioning and other outcomes for inpatients with acute schizophrenia. The program consists of motivational interviewing, self-monitoring, individualized visits, handicraft activities, individualized psychoeducation, and discharge planning. This multicenter, open-labeled, blinded-endpoint, randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of adding IOT to a group OT (GOT) program as usual for outcomes in recently hospitalized patients with schizophrenia in Japanese psychiatric hospitals setting compared with GOT alone. Patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to the GOT+IOT group or the GOT alone group. Among 136 randomized patients, 129 were included in the intent-to-treat population: 66 in the GOT+IOT and 63 in the GOT alone groups. Outcomes were administered at baseline and discharge or 3 months following hospitalization including the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Japanese version (BACS-J), the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale Japanese version, the Social Functioning Scale Japanese version, the Global Assessment of Functioning scale, the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory Japanese version (IMI-J), the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Japanese version of Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8J). Results of linear mixed effects models indicated that the IOT+GOT showed significant improvements in verbal memory (p <0.01), working memory (p = 0.02), verbal fluency (p < 0.01), attention (p < 0.01), and composite score (p < 0.01) on the BACS-J; interest/enjoyment (p < 0.01), value/usefulness (p < 0.01), perceived choice (p < 0.01), and IMI-J total (p < 0.01) on the IMI-J; MMAS-8 score (p < 0.01) compared with the GOT alone. Patients in the GOT+IOT demonstrated significant improvements on the CSQ-8J compared with the GOT alone (p < 0.01). The present findings provide support for the feasibility in implementing an IOT program and its effectiveness for improving cognitive impairment and other outcomes in patients with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

AdultCognitionHumansMaleMotivational InterviewingNeuropsychological TestsOccupational TherapyPatient DischargePatient Education as TopicSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID29621261
PMCPMC5886394
OpenAlexW2796256481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.