Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29620521›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Integrating images from multiple microscopy screens reveals diverse patterns of change in the subcellular localization of proteins.

Alex X Lu, Yolanda T Chong, Ian Shen Hsu, Bob Strome, Louis-Francois Handfield, Oren Kraus, Brenda J Andrews, Alan M Moses

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Subcellular proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Organellar Maps Through Proteomic Profiling - A Conceptual Guide.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020
    Review
  13. Pinpointing Cell Identity in Time and Space.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Spatial proteomics: a powerful discovery tool for cell biology.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alex X LuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Yolanda T ChongTerrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ian Shen HsuDepartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Bob StromeDepartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Louis-Francois HandfieldDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Oren KrausDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Brenda J AndrewsTerrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Alan M MosesDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-3121

Funding

CIHR FDN-143265CIHR MOP-97939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of protein localization changes on a systematic level is a powerful tool for understanding how cells respond to environmental, chemical, or genetic perturbations. To date, work in understanding these proteomic responses through high-throughput imaging has catalogued localization changes independently for each perturbation. To distinguish changes that are targeted responses to the specific perturbation or more generalized programs, we developed a scalable approach to visualize the localization behavior of proteins across multiple experiments as a quantitative pattern. By applying this approach to 24 experimental screens consisting of nearly 400,000 images, we differentiated specific responses from more generalized ones, discovered nuance in the localization behavior of stress-responsive proteins, and formed hypotheses by clustering proteins that have similar patterns. Previous approaches aim to capture all localization changes for a single screen as accurately as possible, whereas our work aims to integrate large amounts of imaging data to find unexpected new cell biology.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene OntologyHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, FluorescenceProtein TransportProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSubcellular FractionsProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsbioimage informaticscell biologycomputational biologyfluorescence microscopyimage analysisproteomicsS. cerevisiaesystems biologyunsupervised machine leaning

Identifiers

PMID29620521
PMCPMC5935485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.