Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29620124›Full record

ArticleNanoscale2018

Precise targeting of cancer metastasis using multi-ligand nanoparticles incorporating four different ligands.

P M Peiris, F He, G Covarrubias, S Raghunathan, O Turan, M Lorkowski, B Gnanasambandam, C Wu, W P Schiemann, E Karathanasis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Virus-inspired strategies for cancer therapy.Seminars in cancer biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Embracing nanomaterials' interactions with the innate immune system.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Biomedical nanoparticle design: What we can learn from viruses.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. PTPmu-targeted nanoparticles label invasive pediatric and adult glioblastoma.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P M PeirisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. stathis@case.edu.
F He
G Covarrubias
S Raghunathan
O Turan
M Lorkowski
B Gnanasambandam
C Wu
W P Schiemann
E Karathanasis
Case Western Reserve University · USCase Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Interdisciplinary Biomedical Imaging Training ProgramT32EB007509 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID Lynn WILSON, Xin Yu · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
Treatment of glioblastoma using targeted nanoparticlesU01CA198892 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KARATHANASIS, EFSTATHIOS · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
Detection of micrometastasis using a dual-ligand nanoparticleR01CA177716 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KARATHANASIS, EFSTATHIOS · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177716NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198892NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis displays a highly heterogeneous cellular population with cancer cells continuously evolving. As a result, a single-ligand nanoparticle cannot account for the continuously changing expression of targetable biomarkers over time and space. To effectively direct nanoparticles to metastasis, we developed a multi-ligand nanoparticle by using four different types of ligands on the same nanoparticle that target biomarkers on the endothelium associated with metastatic disease. These vascular targets included αvβ3 integrin, P-selectin, EGFR and fibronectin. Using terminal and in vivo imaging studies, the targeting performance of the multi-ligand nanoparticles was compared to the single-ligand nanoparticle variants. All four single-ligand nanoparticle variants achieved significant targeting of lung metastasis in the 4T1 mouse model of breast cancer metastasis with about 2.5% of the injected dose being deposited into metastasis. A dual-ligand nanoparticle resulted in a nearly 2-fold higher deposition into lung metastases than its single-ligand counterparts. The multi-ligand nanoparticle significantly outperformed its targeting nanoparticle counterparts achieving a deposition of ∼7% of its injected nanoparticles into lung metastases. Using the high sensitivity of radionuclide imaging, PET imaging showed that a multi-ligand nanoparticle labeled with [18F]fluoride was able to precisely target metastatic disease at its very early stage of development in three different animal models of metastatic breast cancer.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalHumansLigandsLung NeoplasmsMiceNeoplasm MetastasisBiomarkers, TumorLigands

Identifiers

PMID29620124
PMCPMC5908762
OpenAlexW2795259109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.