ArticleNeurocritical care2018
Spontaneous Elevation of Blood Pressure After SAH: An Epiphenomenon of Disease Severity and Demand, But Not a Surrogate for Outcome?
Article in Neurocritical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The metabolic and autoregulatory profile of reversible delayed cerebral ischemia in unconscious patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective multimodal neuromonitoring cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Association of Blood Pressure Variability With Death and Discharge Destination Among Critically Ill Patients With and Without Stroke.Neurology · 2023Article
- Blood pressure and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Devastating delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Nimodipine-Induced Blood Pressure Changes Can Predict Delayed Cerebral Ischemia.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous blood pressure increase is frequently observed after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). These episodes of spontaneous blood pressure alterations are usually tolerated under the assumption of an endogenous response to maintain cerebral perfusion. The relevance of blood pressure variability and its relationship to disease severity and outcome, however, remain obscure.
methodsA total of 115 consecutive patients with aSAH were included for this retrospective analysis of a continuously collected data pool. Demographics, initial clinical severity of aSAH (HH°, mFS), treatment modality, clinical course, and outcome (development of DCI, cerebral infarction, and GOS after 3 months) were recorded. Hemodynamic information-recorded automatically with a frequency of 1/15 min-was analyzed for spontaneous blood pressure increase (SBI) and endogenous persistent hypertension (EPH) after exclusion of iatrogenic factors and relevant co-medication. Subgroup analysis included stratification for day 0-3, 4-14, and 14-21.
resultsSBI and EPH incidence varied from 17 to 84% depending on detection threshold (15-35 mmHg) and time period under scrutiny. Incidence of blood pressure increase correlated with disease severity upon admission (p < 0.05), but the anticipated association with outcome was not observed. SBI and EPH were more likely to occur between day 4 and 14 (p < 0.001), but only early occurrence (day 0-3) was associated with higher incidence of DCI (p < 0.05). Persistent blood pressure elevation between day 4 and 21 was associated with fewer DCI. However, no influence of spontaneous upregulation on clinical outcome after three months was observed.
conclusionsSpontaneous hemodynamic upregulation is a frequent phenomenon after aSAH. Our data support the hypothesis that spontaneous blood pressure alterations reflect an endogenous, demand-driven response correlating with disease severity. Early alterations may indicate an aggravated clinical course, while later upregulation in particular-if permitted-does not translate into a higher risk of unfavorable outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29619659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.