ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2019
Assessment of cerebral hemodynamic parameters using pulsatile versus non-pulsatile cerebral blood outflow models.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between the amplitudes of cerebral blood flow velocity and intracranial pressure using linear and non-linear approach.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
- The time constant of the cerebral arterial bed: exploring age-related implications.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Article
- Predictive value of cerebrovascular time constant for delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024Article
- Quantitative analysis of similarity between cerebral arterial blood volume and intracranial pressure pulse waveforms during intracranial pressure plateau waves.Brain & spine · 2024Article
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2019 end of year summary: monitoring tissue oxygenation and perfusion and its autoregulation.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Review
- Validation of non-invasive cerebrovascular pressure reactivity and pulse amplitude reactivity indices in traumatic brain injury.Acta neurochirurgica · 2020Article
- Cerebral arterial time constant calculated from the middle and posterior cerebral arteries in healthy subjects.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Article
- Predictive value of multimodal neurological monitoring in the postoperative neurological dysfunction after cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrior methods evaluating the changes in cerebral arterial blood volume (∆C MATERIALS AND
methodsContinuous recordings of non-invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP), transcranial Doppler blood flow velocity (CBFV
resultsBoth CrCP and τ gave significantly lower values with the PFF model when compared with the CFF model (p ≪ 0.001 for both). In comparison to normocapnia, both CrCP and τ determined with the PFF model increased during hypocapnia [CrCP
conclusionOur results suggest that the pulsatile flow forward model better reflects changes in CrCP and in τ induced by controlled alterations in EtCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.