Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29619620›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2018

Evidence-Based Non-Pharmacological Therapies for Fibromyalgia.

Mansoor M Aman, R Jason Yong, Alan David Kaye, Richard D Urman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03851042 (Use of Virtual Reality for Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03851042 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Use of Virtual Reality for Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsPain ManagementArmsVirtual Reality Head set in PACU, No intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Duloxetine for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Disability Assessment with WHODAS 2.0 of People with Fibromyalgia in Poland: A Cross Sectional-Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Physical pain among Indigenous Peoples in Canada: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  17. The role of cannabis in treatment-resistant fibromyalgia women.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mansoor M AmanDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
R Jason YongDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Alan David KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Richard D UrmanDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. rurman@bwh.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFibromyalgia (FM) is the second most common rheumatologic pain disorder after osteoarthritis with a multisystem presentation. While the treatment of FM in a clinical setting incorporates both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic modalities, the present investigation reviews evolving literature on cognitive behavioral and complementary medical therapies. The recent medical literature on FM was reviewed between 2012 and 2017 via MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, with an emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and evidence-based treatment guidelines. RECENT

findingsCognitive behavioral therapy continues to play a significant role in the non-medical therapy of FM. It is especially helpful in high catastrophizing patients as evidenced by recent studies that note changes in the brain on functional magnetic resonance imaging. Mindfulness meditation can be helpful in improving pain symptoms and pain perception. No particular diet is found to have a meaningful impact in FM; however, various diets including low fermentable oligo- di -monosaccharides and polyols diet, gluten free, and hypocaloric may be helpful in ameliorating gastrointestinal distress in select patient populations. Current literature does not support the routine use of acupuncture for improving pain or quality of life in FM; however, given its benign side effect profile, it should not be discouraged. Goals for symptom management and pain control should be set early, and patient engagement remains critical in the management of this complex pain presentation. While low quality evidence exists for most non-pharmacologic treatment modalities for FM, CBT and mindfulness meditation show promise for future investigation.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineCognitive Behavioral TherapyComplementary TherapiesFibromyalgiaHumansPain ManagementAcupunctureChronic painCognitive therapyDietFatigueFibromyalgiaMeditationTender pointWidespread pain

Identifiers

PMID29619620
OpenAlexW2796201020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.