Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29619508›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2018

[Preanalytics and biobanking : Influence of preanalytical factors on tissue sample quality].

K-F Becker, J Wipperfürth, E Herpel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K-F BeckerGewebebank des Klinikums rechts der Isar und der Fakultät für Medizin der TU München, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland.
J WipperfürthZentralisierte Biomaterialbank der medizinischen Fakultät der RWTH Aachen Universität, Aachen, Deutschland.
E HerpelGewebebank des NCT am Pathologischen Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland. esther.herpel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to well-characterized human biosamples is one of the most important prerequisites for modern biomedical research. Biobanks play a decisive role here, as they provide corresponding biosamples for planned analyses. Many interfering factors influencing the quality of biosamples have to be taken into account. In addition to logistical, ethical, and data protection aspects, preanalytical variables in the context of sample acquisition, storage, and processing should be mentioned in particular. In this paper, therefore, the most important preanalytical influencing factors are presented systematically and an overview of current national and international activities for the standardized recording of these factors is provided with the goal of being able to better understand their influence on results and to minimize them in the near future.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchHumansSpecimen HandlingPreanalytical phaseReference standardsTissue banksTissue preservation

Identifiers

PMID29619508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.