Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29619379›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

Eosinophils from Physiology to Disease: A Comprehensive Review.

Giuseppe A Ramirez, Mona-Rita Yacoub, Marco Ripa, Daniele Mannina, Adriana Cariddi, Nicoletta Saporiti, Fabio Ciceri, Antonella Castagna, Giselda Colombo, Lorenzo Dagna

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 305 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Benralizumab for Eosinophil-Related Cutaneous Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapy: A Phase II Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Eosinophils in solid cancers: sentinels, predictors, and therapeutic allies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe A RamirezUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2889-366X
Mona-Rita YacoubUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Marco RipaUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Daniele ManninaUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Adriana CariddiUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Nicoletta SaporitiUnit of Immunology, Rheumatology Allergy and Rare Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Fabio CiceriUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Antonella CastagnaUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giselda ColomboUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6704-7434
Lorenzo DagnaUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being the second least represented granulocyte subpopulation in the circulating blood, eosinophils are receiving a growing interest from the scientific community, due to their complex pathophysiological role in a broad range of local and systemic inflammatory diseases as well as in cancer and thrombosis. Eosinophils are crucial for the control of parasitic infections, but increasing evidence suggests that they are also involved in vital defensive tasks against bacterial and viral pathogens including HIV. On the other side of the coin, eosinophil potential to provide a strong defensive response against invading microbes through the release of a large array of compounds can prove toxic to the host tissues and dysregulate haemostasis. Increasing knowledge of eosinophil biological behaviour is leading to major changes in established paradigms for the classification and diagnosis of several allergic and autoimmune diseases and has paved the way to a "golden age" of eosinophil-targeted agents. In this review, we provide a comprehensive update on the pathophysiological role of eosinophils in host defence, inflammation, and cancer and discuss potential clinical implications in light of recent therapeutic advances.

Indexed as

DiseaseAnimalsEosinophilsHumansModels, BiologicalPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID29619379
PMCPMC5829361
OpenAlexW2785409534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.