Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29619333›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science

Role of opioids as coinduction agent with propofol and their effect on apnea time, recovery time, and sedation score.

Manisha Bhatt Dwivedi, Anisha Puri, Sankalp Dwivedi, Harinder Deol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manisha Bhatt DwivediDepartment of Anaesthesiology, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Anisha PuriDepartment of Anaesthesiology, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Sankalp DwivediDepartment of General Surgery, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Harinder DeolDepartment of Anaesthesiology, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a supraglottic device which requires lesser depth of anaesthesia, evokes lesser hemodynamic response and causes lesser stimulation of airway as compared to traditional definitive airway device endotracheal tube. Its placement is possible without muscle relaxants thereby allowing maintenance of anaesthesia on spontaneous respiration thus preventing apnoea or minimizing apnoea time. Propofol, the commonly used induction agent, causes cardiorespiratory depression at higher induction doses. To attenuate this, co-induction agents combined with propofol has been a regular I/V anaesthetic technique these days.

aimComparing apnoea time, recovery time and sedation scores using propofol-fentanyl and propofol-butorphanol combination. METHODOLOGY: Hundred patients scheduled for various elective surgical procedures were randomly selected and divided into two groups of 50 each. As coinduction drug Group F received fentanyl and Group B received butorphanol. In both the groups induction was achieved with I/V propofol and LMA was placed. Apnoea time was noted after induction. Recovery time and sedation scores were recorded after anaesthetic agents were turned off.

resultsAs compared to group F apnoea time was significantly less and recovery time was significantly more in group B (

conclusionConsidering respiratory and recovery profile propofol -butorphanol combination is a safer alternative to propofol-fentanyl combination for LMA insertion.

Indexed as

Apnea timebutorphanolfentanyllaryngeal mask airwaypropofolrecovery

Identifiers

PMID29619333
PMCPMC5869799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.