ArticleJournal of analysis and testing2017
Optical Biosensing of Bacteria and Bacterial Communities.
Article in Journal of analysis and testing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical characterization of bacteria and bacterial systems.The Analyst · 2021Review
- Imaging, Identification and Inhibition of Microorganisms Using AIEgens.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2021Review
- One-step hexaplex immunoassays by on-line paper substrate-based electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for combined cancer biomarker screening.Chemical science · 2021Article
- Advances in Optical Detection of Human-Associated Pathogenic Bacteria.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Microscale and Nanoscale Electrophotonic Diagnostic Devices.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019Review
- Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Molecular Messaging in Bacterial Co-Cultures Studied by Multimodal Chemical Imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019Article
- Whole-cell biosensing by siderophore-based molecular recognition and localized surface plasmon resonance.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2019Article
- Whole-Cell Pseudomonas aeruginosa Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Aptasensor.Analytical chemistry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial sensing is important for understanding the numerous roles bacteria play in nature and in technology, understanding and managing bacterial populations, detecting pathogenic bacterial infections, and preventing the outbreak of illness. Current analytical challenges in bacterial sensing center on the dilemma of rapidly acquiring quantitative information about bacteria with high detection efficiency, sensitivity, and specificity, while operating within a reasonable budget and optimizing the use of ancillary tools, such as multivariate statistics. This review starts from a general description of bacterial sensing methods and challenges, and then focuses on bacterial characterization using optical methods including Raman spectroscopy and imaging, infrared spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging, and plasmonics, including both extended and localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy. The advantages and drawbacks of each method in relation to the others are discussed, as are their applications. A particularly promising direction in bacterial sensing lies in combining multiple approaches to achieve multiplex analysis, and examples where this has been achieved are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.