Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29619165›Full record

ReviewChemical science2017

Ahanjit Bhattacharya, Roberto J Brea, Neal K Devaraj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Chemically Driven Division of Protocells by Membrane Budding.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemical science · 2021
    Article
  11. Lipase mimetic cyclodextrins.Chemical science · 2020
    Article
  12. Temperature-Dependent Reversible Morphological Transformations inThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cell-free gene-regulatory network engineering with synthetic transcription factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  15. Progress in synthesizing protocells.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahanjit BhattacharyaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of California, San Diego , La Jolla , CA 92093 , USA . Email: ndevaraj@ucsd.edu.
Roberto J BreaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of California, San Diego , La Jolla , CA 92093 , USA . Email: ndevaraj@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0321-0156
Neal K DevarajDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of California, San Diego , La Jolla , CA 92093 , USA . Email: ndevaraj@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8033-9973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assembly of artificial cells provides a novel strategy to reconstruct life's functions and shed light on how life emerged on Earth and possibly elsewhere. A major challenge to the development of artificial cells is the establishment of simple methodologies to mimic native membrane generation. An ambitious strategy is the bottom-up approach, which aims to systematically control the assembly of highly ordered membrane architectures with defined functionality. This perspective will cover recent advances and the current state-of-the-art of minimal lipid architectures that can faithfully reconstruct the structure and function of living cells. Specifically, we will overview work related to the

Identifiers

PMID29619165
PMCPMC5858084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.