ReviewThe open orthopaedics journal2018
The Value of Phenotypes in Knee Osteoarthritis Research.
Review in The open orthopaedics journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Advances in heterogeneity and classification of osteoarthritis.Bone research · 2026Review
- Preoperative Clinical Phenotyping for Individualised Rehabilitation in End-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- The Senotherapeutic Effects of APPA (Apocynin [AP] and Paeonol [PA]) on Senescent Human Chondrocytes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Distribution of phenotypes of coronal plane alignment of the knees and functional phenotypes in the healthy young Iranian population: A cross-sectional study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Treat-to-target strategy for knee osteoarthritis. International technical expert panel consensus and good clinical practice statements.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2019Article
- Higher order thinking about differential diagnosis.Brazilian journal of physical therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past decade, phenotypes have been used to help categorize knee osteoarthritis patients relative to being subject to disease, disease progression, and treatment response. A review of potential phenotype selection is now appropriate. The appeal of using phenotypes is that they most rely on simple physical examination, clinically routine imaging, and demographics. The purpose of this review is to describe the panoply of phenotypes that can be potentially used in osteoarthritis research.
methodsA search of PubMed was used singularly to review the literature on knee osteoarthritis phenotypes.
resultsFour phenotype assembly groups were based on physical features and noninvasive imaging. Demographics included metabolic syndrome (dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes). Mechanical characteristics included joint morphology, alignment, the effect of injury, and past and present history. Associated musculoskeletal disorder characteristics included multiple joint involvement, spine disorders, neuromuscular diseases, and osteoporosis. With the knee as an organ, tissue characteristics were used to focus on synovium, meniscus, articular cartilage, patella fat pad, bone sclerosis, bone cysts, and location of pain. DISCUSSION: Many of these phenotype clusters require further validation studies. There is special emphasis on knee osteoarthritis phenotypes due to its predominance in osteoarthritic disorders and the variety of tissues in that joint. More research will be required to determine the most productive phenotypes for future studies.
conclusionThe selection and assignment of phenotypes will take on an increasing role in osteoarthritis research in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.