Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29618775›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

In vivo study of non-invasive effects of non-thermal plasma in pressure ulcer treatment.

Maedeh Chatraie, Giti Torkaman, Mohammadreza Khani, Hossein Salehi, Babak Shokri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparing the efficacy of plasma exeresis and cryotherapy for the treatment of seborrheic keratosis: A randomized controlled trial.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. By any other name: searching for the right plasma nomenclature.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Evaluation of cold atmospheric pressure plasma effects onIranian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maedeh ChatraieLaser applications in medical sciences research center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Giti TorkamanPhysical Therapy Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadreza KhaniLaser - Plasma Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., P.O. Box, 19839-6941, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein SalehiDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Babak ShokriLaser - Plasma Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., P.O. Box, 19839-6941, Tehran, Iran. b-shokri@sbu.ac.ir.
Shahid Beheshti University · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRTarbiat Modares University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to high incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers worldwide, the purpose of this study is using of non-thermal atmospheric plasma as a novel therapy for pressure ulcers. Cold plasma was produced by applying a high-voltage (5 kV) and high-frequency (25 kHz), to helium gas. Under general anesthesia and sterile conditions, two circular magnets were used to create pressure ulcers on the dorsal skin of adult rats. The wounds were divided randomly into control and plasma-treated groups. Animals in the plasma-treated group received plasma radiation for 5 days, each day 3 times and every time 60 s. Mechanical assays were performed to determine plasma effects on the mechanical strength of the repaired tissue. The results showed that mechanical strength of repaired wound in the plasma-treated group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, evidence from histological studies indicates a significantly accelerated wound re-epithelialization in comparison with the control group; angiogenesis and fibrosis (collagen synthesis) were also significantly increased and the inflammation phase of wound healing was shorter in the plasma-treated group. The plasma treatment also resulted in significant wound contraction and acceleration of wound healing. The findings of present study indicate the effects of cold plasma on pressure ulcer treatment.

Indexed as

Re-EpithelializationAnimalsMalePlasma GasesPressure UlcerRatsRats, WistarSkinWound HealingPlasma Gases

Identifiers

PMID29618775
PMCPMC5884810
OpenAlexW2806025331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.