Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29618546›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Attention Selectively Gates Afferent Signal Transmission to Area V4.

Iris Grothe, David Rotermund, Simon David Neitzel, Sunita Mandon, Udo Alexander Ernst, Andreas K Kreiter, Klaus Richard Pawelzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Stimulus representations in visual cortex shaped by spatial attention and microsaccades.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Transient Oscillations of Neural Firing Rate Associated With Routing of Evidence in a Perceptual Decision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Perceptual History Biases Are Predicted by Early Visual-Evoked Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Visual Stimulus Content in V4 Is Conveyed by Gamma-Rhythmic Information Packages.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iris GrotheBrain Research Institute, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6425-7046
David RotermundInstitute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8819-4879
Simon David NeitzelBrain Research Institute, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Sunita MandonBrain Research Institute, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Udo Alexander ErnstInstitute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Andreas K KreiterBrain Research Institute, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany, kreiter@brain.uni-bremen.de.
Klaus Richard PawelzikInstitute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective attention allows focusing on only part of the incoming sensory information. Neurons in the extrastriate visual cortex reflect such selective processing when different stimuli are simultaneously present in their large receptive fields. Their spiking response then resembles the response to the attended stimulus when presented in isolation. Unclear is where in the neuronal pathway attention intervenes to achieve such selective signal routing and processing. To investigate this question, we tagged two equivalent visual stimuli by independent broadband luminance noise and used the spectral coherence of these behaviorally irrelevant signals with the field potential of a local neuronal population in male macaque monkeys' area V4 as a measure for their respective causal influences. This new experimental paradigm revealed that signal transmission was considerably weaker for the not-attended stimulus. Furthermore, our results show that attention does not need to modulate responses in the input populations sending signals to V4 to selectively represent a stimulus, nor do they suggest a change of the V4 neurons' output gain depending on their feature similarity with the stimuli. Our results rather imply that selective attention uses a gating mechanism comprising the synaptic "inputs" that transmit signals from upstream areas into the V4 neurons. A minimal model implementing attention-dependent routing by gamma-band synchrony replicated the attentional gating effect and the signals' spectral transfer characteristics. It supports the proposal that selective interareal gamma-band synchrony subserves signal routing and explains our experimental finding that attention selectively gates signals already at the level of afferent synaptic input.

Indexed as

AttentionSensory GatingAnimalsMacaca mulattaMaleVisual CortexVisual Perceptionarea V4information routingmonkeyneural network modelselective attention

Identifiers

PMID29618546
PMCPMC6596051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.