Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29618486›Full record

ArticleGenome research2018

Optical mapping reveals a higher level of genomic architecture of chained fusions in cancer.

Eva K F Chan, Daniel L Cameron, Desiree C Petersen, Ruth J Lyons, Benedetta F Baldi, Anthony T Papenfuss, David M Thomas, Vanessa M Hayes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DNA Manipulation and Single-Molecule Imaging.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva K F ChanGenomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, New South Wales 2010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6104-3763
Daniel L CameronBioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Desiree C PetersenGenomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, New South Wales 2010, Australia.
Ruth J LyonsGenomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, New South Wales 2010, Australia.
Benedetta F BaldiGenomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, New South Wales 2010, Australia.
Anthony T PapenfussBioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Victoria 3052, Australia.
David M ThomasThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, New South Wales 2010, Australia.
Vanessa M HayesGenomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, New South Wales 2010, Australia.
Garvan Institute of Medical Research · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic rearrangements are common in cancer, with demonstrated links to disease progression and treatment response. These rearrangements can be complex, resulting in fusions of multiple chromosomal fragments and generation of derivative chromosomes. Although methods exist for detecting individual fusions, they are generally unable to reconstruct complex chained events. To overcome these limitations, we adopted a new optical mapping approach, allowing megabase-length genome maps to be reconstructed and rearranged genomes to be visualized without loss of integrity. Whole-genome mapping (Bionano Genomics) of a well-studied highly rearranged liposarcoma cell line resulted in 3338 assembled consensus genome maps, including 72 fusion maps. These fusion maps represent 112.3 Mb of highly rearranged genomic regions, illuminating the complex architecture of chained fusions, including content, order, orientation, and size. Spanning the junction of 147 chromosomal translocations, we found a total of 28 Mb of interspersed sequences that could not be aligned to the reference genome. Traversing these interspersed sequences using short-read sequencing breakpoint calls, we were able to identify and place 399 sequencing fragments within the optical mapping gaps, thus illustrating the complementary nature of optical mapping and short-read sequencing. We demonstrate that optical mapping provides a powerful new approach for capturing a higher level of complex genomic architecture, creating a scaffold for renewed interpretation of sequencing data of particular relevance to human cancer.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationCell Line, TumorChromosome AberrationsChromosome MappingGene FusionGene RearrangementGenome, HumanHaplotypesHumansModels, GeneticNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID29618486
PMCPMC5932612
OpenAlexW2795833623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.