Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29618394›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2018

Comparison of Predictors and Mortality Between Bloodstream Infections Caused by ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli and ESBL-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Oded Scheuerman, Vered Schechner, Yehuda Carmeli, Belen Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Esther Calbo, Benito Almirante, Pier-Luigy Viale, Antonio Oliver, Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa, Oriol Gasch and 26 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01764490 (Impact of Specific Antimicrobials and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01764490 completednot on this map

Impact of Specific Antimicrobials and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration(MIC) Values on the Outcome of Bloodstream Infections Due to ESBL or Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an Observational Multinational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorJESUS RODRIGUEZ BAÑORan2013 to 2014Enrolled1,344ConditionsClinically Significant Bacteremia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  8. Incidence of colonization and infection with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Toronto and Peel Region, Ontario, 2007-2024.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Regional surveillance of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Is Carbapenem Therapy Necessary for the Treatment of Non-CTX-M Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infections?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Oded Scheuerman1Division of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center,Tel Aviv,Israel.
Vered Schechner1Division of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center,Tel Aviv,Israel.
Yehuda Carmeli1Division of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center,Tel Aviv,Israel.
Belen Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez4Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología,Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena,Seville,Spain.
Esther Calbo6Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa,Barcelona,Spain.
Benito Almirante7Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón,Barcelona,Spain.
Pier-Luigy Viale8Teaching Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi,Bologna,Italy.
Antonio Oliver9Hospital Universitario Son Espases,Palma de Mallorca,Spain.
Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa10Hospital Ramón y Cajal,Madrid,Spain.
Oriol Gasch11Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Taulí,Sabadell,Barcelona,Spain.
Monica Gozalo12Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL,Santander,Spain.
Johann Pitout13Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,University of Calgary,Calgary,Alberta,Canada.
Murat Akova14Hacettepe University School of Medicine,Ankara,Turkey.
Carmen Peña15Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge,Barcelona,Spain.
Jose Molina16Infectious Diseases,Microbiology and Preventive Medicine,Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS),University Hospital Virgen del Rocio,CSIC,University of Seville,Seville,Spain.
Alicia Hernández-Torres17Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca,Murcia,Spain.
Mario Venditti18Policlinico Umberto I,University of Rome La Sapienza,Rome,Italy.
Nuria Prim19Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau,Barcelona,Spain.
Julia Origüen20Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre,Madrid,Spain.
German Bou21Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña,A Coruña,Spain.
Evelina Tacconelli22Universitätsklinikum Tübingen,Tübingen,Germany.
Maria Tumbarello23Catholic University of the Sacred Heart,Rome,Italy.
Axel Hamprecht24Institut für Mikrobiologie,Immunologie und Hygiene Universitätsklinikum Köln,Cologne,Germany.
Ilias Karaiskos25Hygeia General Hospital,Athens,Greece.
Cristina de la Calle26Hospital Clinic,Barcelona,Spain.
Federico Pérez27Research Service,Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center,Cleveland,Ohio,United States.
Mitchell J Schwaber1Division of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center,Tel Aviv,Israel.
Joaquin Bermejo28Hospital Español,Rosario,Argentina.
Warren Lowman29Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre,Johannesburg,South Africa.
Po-Ren Hsueh30National Taiwan University Hospital,National Taiwan University Hospital College of Medicine,Taipei,Taiwan.
Carolina Navarro-San Francisco31Hospital Universitario La Paz,Madrid,Spain.
Robert A Bonomo27Research Service,Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center,Cleveland,Ohio,United States.
David L Paterson33University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research,The University of Queensland,Herston,Brisbane,Australia.
Alvaro Pascual4Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología,Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena,Seville,Spain.
Jesus Rodríguez-Baño4Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología,Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena,Seville,Spain.
REIPI/ESGBIS/INCREMENT investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVETo compare the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and mortality of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) versus ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP) and to examine the differences in clinical characteristics and outcome between BSIs caused by isolates with CTX-M versus other ESBL genotypesMETHODSAs part of the INCREMENT project, 33 tertiary hospitals in 12 countries retrospectively collected data on adult patients diagnosed with ESBL-EC BSI or ESBL-KP BSI between 2004 and 2013. Risk factors for ESBL-EC versus ESBL-KP BSI and for 30-day mortality were examined by bivariate analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression.RESULTSThe study included 909 patients: 687 with ESBL-EC BSI and 222 with ESBL-KP BSI. ESBL genotype by polymerase chain reaction amplification of 286 isolates was available. ESBL-KP BSI was associated with intensive care unit admission, cardiovascular and neurological comorbidities, length of stay to bacteremia >14 days from admission, and a nonurinary source. Overall, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with ESBL-KP BSI than ESBL-EC BSI (33.7% vs 17.4%; odds ratio, 1.64; P=.016). CTX-M was the most prevalent ESBL subtype identified (218 of 286 polymerase chain reaction-tested isolates, 76%). No differences in clinical characteristics or in mortality between CTX-M and non-CTX-M ESBLs were detected.CONCLUSIONSClinical characteristics and risk of mortality differ significantly between ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP BSI. Therefore, all ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae should not be considered a homogeneous group. No differences in outcomes between genotypes were detected.CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIERClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01764490.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:660-667.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBacteremiabeta-LactamasesCross InfectionEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleGenotypeHospital RecordsHumansKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Agedbeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID29618394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.