Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29618353›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

Efficacy of virtual block objects in reducing the lung dose in helical tomotherapy planning for cervical oesophageal cancer: a planning study.

Makoto Ito, Hidetoshi Shimizu, Takahiro Aoyama, Hiroyuki Tachibana, Natsuo Tomita, Chiyoko Makita, Yutaro Koide, Daiki Kato, Tsuneo Ishiguchi, Takeshi Kodaira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of lung volume on helical radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: are there predictive factors to achieve acceptable lung doses?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Makoto ItoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan. itou.makoto.292@mail.aichi-med-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-1594
Hidetoshi ShimizuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahiro AoyamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroyuki TachibanaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Natsuo TomitaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Chiyoko MakitaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Yutaro KoideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Daiki KatoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Tsuneo IshiguchiDepartment of Radiology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Yazako-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Takeshi KodairaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensity-modulated radiotherapy is useful for cervical oesophageal carcinoma (CEC); however, increasing low-dose exposure to the lung may lead to radiation pneumonitis. Nevertheless, an irradiation technique that avoids the lungs has never been examined due to the high difficulty of dose optimization. In this study, we examined the efficacy of helical tomotherapy that can restrict beamlets passing virtual blocks during dose optimization computing (block plan) in reducing the lung dose.

methodsFifteen patients with CEC were analysed. The primary/nodal lesion and prophylactic nodal region with adequate margins were defined as the planning target volume (PTV)-60 Gy and PTV-48 Gy, respectively. Nineteen plans per patient were made and compared (total: 285 plans), including non-block and block plans with several shapes and sizes.

resultsThe most appropriate block model was semi-circular, 8 cm outside of the tracheal bifurcation, with a significantly lower lung dose compared to that of non-block plans; the mean lung volumes receiving 5 Gy, 10 Gy, 20 Gy, and the mean lung dose were 31.3% vs. 48.0% (p <  0.001), 22.4% vs. 39.4% (p <  0.001), 13.2% vs. 16.0% (p = 0.028), and 7.1 Gy vs. 9.6 Gy (p <  0.001), respectively. Both the block and non-block plans were comparable in terms of the homogeneity and conformity indexes of PTV-60 Gy: 0.05 vs. 0.04 (p = 0.100) and 0.82 vs. 0.85 (p = 0.616), respectively. The maximum dose of the spinal cord planning risk volume increased slightly (49.4 Gy vs. 47.9 Gy, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the mean doses to the heart and the thyroid gland. Prolongation of the delivery time was less than 1 min (5.6 min vs. 4.9 min, p = 0.010).

conclusionsThe block plan for CEC could significantly reduce the lung dose, with acceptable increment in the spinal dose and a slightly prolonged delivery time.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskRadiation PneumonitisRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesCervical oesophageal cancerComplete blockDirectional blockHelical tomotherapyIntensity-modulated radiation therapyLung dose

Identifiers

PMID29618353
PMCPMC5885420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.