Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29618236›Full record

ArticleJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry2018

Designing a new biosensor "DNA ELISA" to detect Escherichia coli using genomic DNA and comparison of this method to PCR-ELISA.

Elaheh Hashemi, Mehdi Forouzandeh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elaheh Hashemia Department of Medical Biotechnology , Tarbiat Modares University , Tehran , Iran.
Mehdi Forouzandeha Department of Medical Biotechnology , Tarbiat Modares University , Tehran , Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this experiment, DNA-ELISA biosensor was introduced, bearing the ability to detect specific bacteria in about 4 h. This is a more rapid system in comparison to conventional methods, like colony counting method. Moreover, this method does not require any amplification and directly detects genomic DNA of bacteria, giving a lower limit to the sensitivity of 40,000 bacteria. In this study, two specific probes capture (biotin labelled) and detector (dig labelled), were used against special regions of 16s rRNA gene of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922. The capture probe has the ability to trap the target bacterial DNA from a pool of other kinds of bacteria under specific conditions. The detector probe then was used to hybridize to the genome of trapped bacteria. The detection proceeds by adding HRP-anti dig enzyme and its substrate, ABTS to emit light. Light absorbance is measured for verifying the detection.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEquipment DesignPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliDNA, BacterialDNA-ELISAEscherichia colihybridisationprobe

Identifiers

PMID29618236
PMCPMC6010088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.