Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29617935›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2018

Population Density in Hiroshima and Nagasaki Before the Bombings in 1945: Its Measurement and Impact on Radiation Risk Estimates in the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors.

Benjamin French, Sachiyo Funamoto, Hiromi Sugiyama, Ritsu Sakata, John Cologne, Harry M Cullings, Kiyohiko Mabuchi, Dale L Preston

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Incidence of Diabetes in the Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1969-2015.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin FrenchDepartment of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Sachiyo FunamotoDepartment of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiromi SugiyamaDepartment of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ritsu SakataDepartment of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
John CologneDepartment of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Harry M CullingsDepartment of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kiyohiko MabuchiRadiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Dale L PrestonHirosoft International Corporation, Eureka, California.

Funding

NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400009C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors, differences in urbanicity between high-dose and low-dose survivors could confound the association between radiation dose and adverse outcomes. We obtained data on the population distribution in Hiroshima and Nagasaki before the 1945 bombings and quantified the impact of adjustment for population density on radiation risk estimates for mortality (1950-2003) and incident solid cancer (1958-2009). Population density ranged from 4,671 to 14,378 people/km2 in the urban region of Hiroshima and 5,748 to 19,149 people/km2 in the urban region of Nagasaki. Radiation risk estimates for solid cancer mortality were attenuated by 5.1% after adjustment for population density, but those for all-cause mortality and incident solid cancer were unchanged. There was no overall association between population density and adverse outcomes, but there was evidence that the association between density and mortality differed according to age at exposure. Among survivors who were 10-14 years of age in 1945, there was a positive association between population density and risk of all-cause mortality (per 5,000-people/km2 increase, relative risk = 1.053, 95% confidence interval: 1.027, 1.079) and solid cancer mortality (per 5,000-people/km2 increase, relative risk = 1.069, 95% confidence interval: 1.025, 1.115). Our results suggest that radiation risk estimates from the Life Span Study are not sensitive to unmeasured confounding by urban-rural differences.

Indexed as

MortalityPopulation DensityAdolescentAdultChildDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanMaleNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRisk AssessmentYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29617935
PMCPMC6070048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.