ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2018
Invited Commentary: The Microbiome and Population Health-Considerations for Enhancing Study Design and Data Analysis in Observational and Interventional Epidemiology.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human microbiome variation associated with race and ethnicity emerges as early as 3 months of age.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Measurement and characterization of the human microbiome in large population-based human studies has recently become a reality secondary to technological advances in high-throughput DNA sequencing. These advances bring new challenges and knowledge gaps for study planning, data analysis, and interpretation that are novel to large-scale epidemiologic studies. In this issue of the Journal, Sinha et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(6):1282-1290) have provided data with which to inform statistical power and sample size requirements for microbiome studies in population-based settings. This work serves as a helpful starting point for study planning while also serving as a springboard for discussion regarding additional considerations for improving microbiome research. This commentary emphasizes the importance of selecting microbiome metrics appropriate for the biological hypothesis under investigation, as well as the need for new analytical tools that can better capitalize on the unique yet rich information contained in microbiome data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.