ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018
Plastid Transcript Editing across Dinoflagellate Lineages Shows Lineage-Specific Application but Conserved Trends.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Massive RNA Editing in Ascetosporean Mitochondria.Microbes and environments · 2025Article
- Interpreting the complexities of the plastid genome in dinoflagellates: a mini-review of recent advances.Plant molecular biology · 2024Review
- New plastids, old proteins: repeated endosymbiotic acquisitions in kareniacean dinoflagellates.EMBO reports · 2024Article
- Comparative Plastid Genomics of Green-Colored Dinoflagellates Unveils Parallel Genome Compaction and RNA Editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- The Evolution of the Cytochrome c6 Family of Photosynthetic Electron Transfer Proteins.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Photosynthesis acclimation under severely fluctuating light conditions allows faster growth of diatoms compared with dinoflagellates.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Genomes of the dinoflagellate Polarella glacialis encode tandemly repeated single-exon genes with adaptive functions.BMC biology · 2020Article
- Gene fragmentation and RNA editing without borders: eccentric mitochondrial genomes of diplonemids.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Correlation between Organelle Genetic Variation and RNA Editing in Dinoflagellates Associated with the Coral Acropora digitifera.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Unparalleled Variation in RNA Editing amongPlant physiology · 2020Article
- The preponderance of nonsynonymous A-to-I RNA editing in coleoids is nonadaptive.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Small Genomes and Big Data: Adaptation of Plastid Genomics to the High-Throughput Era.Biomolecules · 2019Review
- High Level of Conservation of Mitochondrial RNA Editing Sites Among FourG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Dinoflagellates are a group of unicellular protists with immense ecological and evolutionary significance and cell biological diversity. Of the photosynthetic dinoflagellates, the majority possess a plastid containing the pigment peridinin, whereas some lineages have replaced this plastid by serial endosymbiosis with plastids of distinct evolutionary affiliations, including a fucoxanthin pigment-containing plastid of haptophyte origin. Previous studies have described the presence of widespread substitutional RNA editing in peridinin and fucoxanthin plastid genes. Because reports of this process have been limited to manual assessment of individual lineages, global trends concerning this RNA editing and its effect on the biological function of the plastid are largely unknown. Using novel bioinformatic methods, we examine the dynamics and evolution of RNA editing over a large multispecies data set of dinoflagellates, including novel sequence data from the peridinin dinoflagellate Pyrocystis lunula and the fucoxanthin dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi. We demonstrate that while most individual RNA editing events in dinoflagellate plastids are restricted to single species, global patterns, and functional consequences of editing are broadly conserved. We find that editing is biased toward specific codon positions and regions of genes, and generally corrects otherwise deleterious changes in the genome prior to translation, though this effect is more prevalent in peridinin than fucoxanthin lineages. Our results support a model for promiscuous editing application subsequently shaped by purifying selection, and suggest the presence of an underlying editing mechanism transferred from the peridinin-containing ancestor into fucoxanthin plastids postendosymbiosis, with remarkably conserved functional consequences in the new lineage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.