Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29617800›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Plastid Transcript Editing across Dinoflagellate Lineages Shows Lineage-Specific Application but Conserved Trends.

Christen M Klinger, Lucas Paoli, Robert J Newby, Matthew Yu-Wei Wang, Hyrum D Carroll, Jeffrey D Leblond, Christopher J Howe, Joel B Dacks, Chris Bowler, Aubery Bruce Cahoon and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Christen M KlingerDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lucas PaoliDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Robert J NewbyDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University.
Matthew Yu-Wei WangCenter for Computational Science and Department of Computer Science, Columbus State University, Columbus, GA 31907.
Hyrum D CarrollCenter for Computational Science and Department of Computer Science, Columbus State University, Columbus, GA 31907.
Jeffrey D LeblondDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University.
Christopher J HoweDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Joel B DacksDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Chris BowlerInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Aubery Bruce CahoonDepartment of Natural Sciences, The University of Virginia's College at Wise.
Richard G DorrellInstitut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Elisabeth RichardsonDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Alberta · CAColumbus State University · USMiddle Tennessee State University · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Virginia's College at Wise · US

Funding

Measuring Design, Reporting and Funding Bias in Nonclinical ResearchR21ES021028 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BERO, LISA A · 2011 to 2012
$425k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES021028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dinoflagellates are a group of unicellular protists with immense ecological and evolutionary significance and cell biological diversity. Of the photosynthetic dinoflagellates, the majority possess a plastid containing the pigment peridinin, whereas some lineages have replaced this plastid by serial endosymbiosis with plastids of distinct evolutionary affiliations, including a fucoxanthin pigment-containing plastid of haptophyte origin. Previous studies have described the presence of widespread substitutional RNA editing in peridinin and fucoxanthin plastid genes. Because reports of this process have been limited to manual assessment of individual lineages, global trends concerning this RNA editing and its effect on the biological function of the plastid are largely unknown. Using novel bioinformatic methods, we examine the dynamics and evolution of RNA editing over a large multispecies data set of dinoflagellates, including novel sequence data from the peridinin dinoflagellate Pyrocystis lunula and the fucoxanthin dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi. We demonstrate that while most individual RNA editing events in dinoflagellate plastids are restricted to single species, global patterns, and functional consequences of editing are broadly conserved. We find that editing is biased toward specific codon positions and regions of genes, and generally corrects otherwise deleterious changes in the genome prior to translation, though this effect is more prevalent in peridinin than fucoxanthin lineages. Our results support a model for promiscuous editing application subsequently shaped by purifying selection, and suggest the presence of an underlying editing mechanism transferred from the peridinin-containing ancestor into fucoxanthin plastids postendosymbiosis, with remarkably conserved functional consequences in the new lineage.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularConserved SequenceDinoflagellidaGenomePhylogenyPlastidsRNA EditingSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID29617800
PMCPMC5888634
OpenAlexW2791876290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.