Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29617523›Full record

Trial reportJAMA cardiology2018

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Physical and Social Activity Limitations in Patients With Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial.

Alvin Chandra, Eldrin F Lewis, Brian L Claggett, Akshay S Desai, Milton Packer, Michael R Zile, Karl Swedberg, Jean L Rouleau, Victor C Shi, Martin P Lefkowitz and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01035255 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01035255 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2009 to 2014Enrolled8,442ConditionsHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionArmsLCZ696 200 mg BID, Enalapril 10 mg BID
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Highlights in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Alvin ChandraBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eldrin F LewisBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brian L ClaggettBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Akshay S DesaiBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Milton PackerBaylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Michael R ZileMedical University of South Carolina and Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston.
Karl SwedbergDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jean L RouleauNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, England.
Victor C ShiNovartis, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Martin P LefkowitzNovartis, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Tzvetana KatovaNational Hospital of Cardiology, Sofia, Bulgaria.
John J V McMurrayBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Scott D SolomonBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USNovartis (United States) · USBaylor University Medical Center · USBritish Heart Foundation · GBMedical University of South Carolina · USMontreal Heart Institute · CANational Heart Hospital · BGUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Research Training ProgramT32HL094301 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Marcelo F DI CARLI · 2010 to 2026
$7.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with heart failure is markedly reduced compared with that in patients with other chronic diseases, demonstrating substantial limitations in physical and social activities. In the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With an ACE-Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial, sacubitril/valsartan improved overall HRQL compared with enalapril, as determined by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Objective: To examine the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on physical and social activities. Design, Setting, and Participants: The PARADIGM-HF trial was a randomized, double-blind, active treatment-controlled clinical trial performed from December 8, 2009, to March 31, 2014, in 8399 patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV disease and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less at 1043 centers in 38 countries. Data analysis was performed from August 1, 2017, to December 25, 2017. Interventions: Sacubitril/valsartan, 200 mg twice daily, or enalapril, 10 mg twice daily. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients completed HRQL assessments using the KCCQ at randomization, 4-month, 8-month, and annual visits. The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on components of the physical and social limitation sections of the KCCQ at 8 months and longitudinally and related biomarkers and clinical outcomes were studied. Results: At baseline, 7618 of 8399 patients (90.7%) (mean [SD] age, 64 [11] years; 5987 [78.6%] male and 1631 [21.4%] female) completed the initial KCCQ assessment. Patients reported the greatest limitations at baseline in jogging and sexual relationships. Patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan had significantly better adjusted change scores in most physical and social activities at 8 months and during 36 months compared with those receiving enalapril. The largest improvement over enalapril was in household chores (adjusted change score difference, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.19-3.50; P < .001) and sexual relationships (adjusted change score difference, 2.72; 95% CI, 0.97-4.46; P = .002); both persisted through 36 months (overall change score difference, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.78-2.60], P < .001; and 2.36 [95% CI, 1.01-3.71], P = .001, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved nearly all KCCQ physical and social activities compared with enalapril, with the largest responses in household chores and sexual relationships. In addition to reduced likelihood of cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and heart failure hospitalization, sacubitril/valsartan may improve limitations in common activities in these patients. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01035255.

Indexed as

ExerciseSocial BehaviorActivities of Daily LivingAgedAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsEnalaprilFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsEnalaprilsacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationTetrazolesValsartan

Identifiers

PMID29617523
PMCPMC6128510
OpenAlexW2795886217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.