Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29617452›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A sibling method for identifying vQTLs.

Dalton Conley, Rebecca Johnson, Ben Domingue, Christopher Dawes, Jason Boardman, Mark L Siegal

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Many roads to a gene-environment interaction.American journal of human genetics · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Assessing the contribution of genetic nurture to refractive error.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022
    Article
  5. A quantile integral linear model to quantify genetic effects on phenotypic variability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dalton ConleyDepartment of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Rebecca JohnsonDepartment of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2475-6622
Ben DomingueGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Christopher DawesWilff Family Department of Politics, New York University, New York City, NY, United States of America.
Jason BoardmanInstitute for Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States of America.
Mark L SiegalCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.
New York University · USPrinceton University · USStanford University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Scientific and Technical Computing CoreP2CHD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Genetic and Nongenetic Variation in Complex TraitsR35GM118170 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SIEGAL, MARK L · 2016 to 2021
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047879NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The propensity of a trait to vary within a population may have evolutionary, ecological, or clinical significance. In the present study we deploy sibling models to offer a novel and unbiased way to ascertain loci associated with the extent to which phenotypes vary (variance-controlling quantitative trait loci, or vQTLs). Previous methods for vQTL-mapping either exclude genetically related individuals or treat genetic relatedness among individuals as a complicating factor addressed by adjusting estimates for non-independence in phenotypes. The present method uses genetic relatedness as a tool to obtain unbiased estimates of variance effects rather than as a nuisance. The family-based approach, which utilizes random variation between siblings in minor allele counts at a locus, also allows controls for parental genotype, mean effects, and non-linear (dominance) effects that may spuriously appear to generate variation. Simulations show that the approach performs equally well as two existing methods (squared Z-score and DGLM) in controlling type I error rates when there is no unobserved confounding, and performs significantly better than these methods in the presence of small degrees of confounding. Using height and BMI as empirical applications, we investigate SNPs that alter within-family variation in height and BMI, as well as pathways that appear to be enriched. One significant SNP for BMI variability, in the MAST4 gene, replicated. Pathway analysis revealed one gene set, encoding members of several signaling pathways related to gap junction function, which appears significantly enriched for associations with within-family height variation in both datasets (while not enriched in analysis of mean levels). We recommend approximating laboratory random assignment of genotype using family data and more careful attention to the possible conflation of mean and variance effects.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociSiblingsBody HeightBody Mass IndexChromosome MappingComputer SimulationGenotypeHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID29617452
PMCPMC5884517
OpenAlexW2796414099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.